GEOARCH, Inc.

GEOARCH, Inc. GEOARCH, Inc. (formerly GEOARCH) is a woman owned small business specializing in archeological, geoa GEOARCH Inc. and the yearly Vermont Archeology Month.

Just below our feet lies Vermont and the nation's hidden past. GEOARCH Inc.'s Kathleen Callum and Robert Sloma use their archeological expertise to serve businesses and individuals with legal compliance, heritage tourism, site stewardship, and outreach or educational needs. National, state, and local laws like Federal Section 106 and ACT 250 protect our "rich and ancient heritage." We guide engine

ers, developers, landowners, public officials, and many others through the regulatory process in a efficient, friendly, and competitive manner. With a passion for local history and archeology, GEOARCH Inc.'s staff helps save the past for our state's future by interpreting archeological sites for the public. We help organizations develop their local archeological resources and sites into a heritage tourism advantage guaranteed to draw attention to downtowns or revitalize the Vermont's economy. incorporated in 1997, but has been conducting business as an archeological consulting firm since 1991 throughout Vermont and the Northeast. Based on scenic Lake Dunmore, the firm also works throughout North America on archeological projects as interdisciplinary specialists in geology, soils, and paleoenvironmental analysis. remains committed to archeological public outeach via strong support of the Vermont Archaeological Society, Inc.

08/21/2026

NATHPO, along with theNational Congress of American Indians. the on American Indian Affairs. and the United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc. Sovereignty Protection Fund, issued a joint statement in strong support of protecting the Section 106 process of the National Historic Preservation Act.

Section 106 gives Tribal Nations a seat at the federal decision-making table, helping protect sacred places, ancestral lands, burial places, and cultural landscapes before federal decisions become irreversible. Proposed revisions to 36 C.F.R. Part 800 would expand federal agency discretion, weaken meaningful government-to-government consultation, and fall short of the federal government's trust and treaty obligations.

Once a sacred place is destroyed or ancestral remains are disturbed, consultation after the fact cannot restore what has been lost. Our organizations stand united to ensure Section 106 is strengthened, not weakened.

Read the full joint statement and learn how to take action:

https://www.ncai.org/news/joint-statement-on-protecting-section-106-process-of-nhpa?utm_campaign=47882608-Statement%20%2F%20Press%20Release&utm_content=384558769&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&hss_channel=fbp-244554749685&fbclid=IwVERDUATy4S9wZG9mBWV4dG4DYWVtAjEwAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHnK8UpQ1lyOkhWLFMdyX8qPeGyCE8zdosns79T7TDFJUPPy5KpXeGQ6Q0Ilq_aem_-gctuFlJ2us5aUAgyeSArQ

08/19/2026
08/19/2026

📣 Join the Sand Creek Massacre Foundation in opposing proposed revisions to the National Historic Preservation Act that would jeopardize historic sites nationwide by contacting your state, tribal and federal representatives!

Read our statement below:

The Sand Creek Massacre Foundation strongly urges state and federal representatives to oppose the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s (ACHP) proposed drastic revisions to the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. These proposed changes will erase 60 years of historic preservation policy and threaten the survival of the most significant sites, places, and landscapes that have long endured as icons of the nation’s shared history.

The ACHP’s proposal would virtually eliminate the ability of individuals, communities, local and state governments and Tribes to participate in the identification and protection of the historic sites and places that define their cultural identities; places such as the site of the Sand Creek Massacre, where the United States Army slaughtered 230 peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho people in 1864.

Without the currently robust “Section 106 process”, sacred places like the Sand Creek Massacre Site may not survive unilateral federal agency decisions about the impacts of potentially damaging undertakings. Had the Sand Creek Massacre Site not been identified through a collaborative federal/state/tribal process, the site may never have been preserved, its significance as one of the most sacred places in the Cheyenne and Arapaho worlds would not be understood, and its memory would be largely forgotten by the American people. The truth of that atrocity and its significance in American history would never be acknowledged nor serve as a source of healing, education and reflection on our contemporary world.

While the Sand Creek Massacre Site is now preserved as a national historic site, many other similarly sacred, nationally significant and irreplaceable sites and places will be endangered under the ACHP’s gutted regulatory changes. As we speak, the West Texas site of the 1918 Porvenier Massacre is facing destruction by the Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection, to be replaced by the border wall. Under the ACHP’s proposed regulations, there may be no opportunity for descendants of massacre victims to participate in a collaborative process leading to measures to avoid or minimize harm to the historic site.

Without the opportunity for the participation of citizens at the local, state and Tribal levels in the identification of sites like those of the Sand Creek Massacre and consultation with federal agencies about how to minimize or avoid harm to them, innumerable archaeological sites, sacred places, cultural landscapes and other memorials of America’s story will be damaged or destroyed without recourse.

Of most concern to the Sand Creek Massacre Foundation is the ACHP’s proposed elimination of Tribal involvement in the Section 106 process. This egregious proposal violates the deeply ingrained tenets of the government-to-government relationship with American Indian Tribes and blatantly undermines federal trust and resources stewardship responsibilities.

We urge you to oppose this draconian assault on the National Historic Preservation Act, especially (and ironically) during celebrations of the nation’s 250th anniversary. Protect the National Historic Preservation Act, and the hard-won regulations that carry out its purposes. Without our history, we are not American.

https://www.sandcreekmassacrefoundation.org/news

History Colorado
Cultural Heritage Partners
National Alliance of Preservation Commissions
National Parks Conservation Association

Please make your voices heard…
08/15/2026

Please make your voices heard…

NATHPO has a seat on the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and we value the work we have done with the Council to better protect sacred places and cultural resources. We don’t, therefore, call the Council’s proposed changes to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act “an affront to Tribal sovereignty” lightly.

It speaks to what is at stake. If enacted, these changes would essentially remove Tribal Nations from the conversation about how best to implement federal projects, and it would fail to acknowledge the importance of the living cultural landscape not just for history, but for the daily spiritual and cultural practices of Tribal communities today and in the future.

https://www.wyso.org/indigenous-affairs/2026-08-06/sacred-historic-ohio-sites-could-have-weakened-protections-under-proposed-federal-regulations

Section 106 of the NHPA gives First Nationa /Native American tribes a chance to comment on development projects that imp...
07/31/2026

Section 106 of the NHPA gives First Nationa /Native American tribes a chance to comment on development projects that impact sacred sites and burials.

07/24/2026
Love our perfectly imperfect history? We have friends everywhere!
03/29/2026

Love our perfectly imperfect history? We have friends everywhere!

March 28, 2026 (Saturday)

Almost exactly a year ago, on March 27, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.” The order asserted that “[o]ver the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth.”

The order claimed, as Trump did in his first term, that “historical revision” was reconstructing “our Nation’s unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty, individual rights, and human happiness…as inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed.” Trump has claimed since his first term that a “left-wing mob is trying to demolish our heritage, so they can replace it with a new oppressive regime that they alone control.” He told his followers that they are in “a battle to save the Heritage, History, and Greatness of our Country.”

Embracing the idea that there is a perfect past currently being destroyed, Trump echoes twentieth-century fascists who promised to return their country to divinely inspired rules that, if ignored, would create disaster.

Trump’s order called for putting his ideology in place, turning federal historic sites, parks, and museums into “solemn and uplifting public monuments that remind Americans of our extraordinary heritage, consistent progress toward becoming a more perfect Union, and unmatched record of advancing liberty, prosperity, and human flourishing.”

The order directed the Secretary of the Interior to “determine whether, since January 1, 2020, public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties within the Department of the Interior’s jurisdiction have been removed or changed to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology,” to restore their previous content, and to make sure that they “do not contain descriptions, depictions, or other content that inappropriately disparage Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times), and instead focus on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people or, with respect to natural features, the beauty, abundance, and grandeur of the American landscape.”

Setting administration officials’ eyes on the Smithsonian Institution, it said: “Museums in our Nation’s capital should be places where individuals go to learn—not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history.” Trump’s order named a three-person team to review the Smithsonian’s museums, including his Florida criminal defense attorney Lindsey Halligan, who joined his team from the field of property law and who, as legal analyst Anna Bower observed, “didn't like some of the museum's exhibits when she visited after the inauguration so she convinced Trump to sign an executive order putting her in charge.” Also on the team is Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget and a key author of Project 2025.

Since then, Trump’s people have tried to rewrite American history according to their ideology. Revealingly, one of the first things the administration did to alter the past was to remove from a U.S. military cemetery in the Netherlands two displays that recognized Black soldiers who helped liberate Europe from the N***s.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued his own order on May 20, 2025, also titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.” He told officials at all National Park Service sites to make sure information in the park adhered to Trump's demands and to ask the public to let them know if they had “any signs or other information that are negative about either past or living Americans or that fail to emphasize the beauty, grandeur, and abundance of landscapes and other natural features.”

By July 2025, National Park Service teams were trying to figure out what the vague order not to “inappropriately disparage Americans” meant, flagging exhibits on sea level rise due to climate change at Cape Hatteras National Seashore in North Carolina, human enslavement at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia, and the imprisonment of Seminoles, Cheyennes, Araphaos, Kiowas, Comanches, Caddos, and Apaches at the Castillo de San Marcos National Monument in Florida.

On August 12, 2025, Trump’s Smithsonian team wrote to Dr. Lonnie Bunch, the historian who serves as the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, informing him they intend to review museum exhibitions, curatorial processes, planning, the use of collections, and artists’ grants in order to make sure they align “with the president’s directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.”

They said they were focusing on the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery, and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.

On December 18, 2025, they wrote to Bunch again to complain he had not provided as much information as they had requested. They expressed concern “that the museums of the Smithsonian Institution be well positioned to play an important role during the historic yearlong celebration of our Nation’s 250th birthday that is fast approaching. We wish to be assured that none of the leadership of the Smithsonian museums is confused about the fact that the United States has been among the greatest forces for good in the history of the world,” they wrote. “The American people will have no patience for any museum that is diffident about America’s founding or otherwise uncomfortable conveying a positive view of American history, one which is justifiably proud of our country’s accomplishments and record.”

At about the same time, Trump unveiled that the history he intended to see shared was one that remade the U.S. by destroying its complicated history of struggle toward multicultural democracy and rewriting it as a dictatorship.

In mid-December the White House revealed that Trump had attached partisan descriptions of previous presidents on the “Presidential Walk of Fame” at the White House, calling Democratic president Barack Obama “one of the most divisive figures in American History,” and Joe Biden “by far, the worst President in American History.” “Taking office as a result of the most corrupt Election ever seen in the United States,” it continued, “Biden oversaw a series of unprecedented disasters that brought our Nation to the brink of destruction.” Trump described himself, though, as the architect of “the Greatest Economy in the History of the World.”

Then, on the fifth anniversary of the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, the White House unveiled a new website blaming the Democrats for the attack and saying Trump had “corrected a historic wrong” by pardoning the rioters. Under pressure from the White House, the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery removed text by Trump’s portrait that referred to Trump’s two impeachments, as well as his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election.

In January the National Park Service took down displays about the enslavement of nine Black Americans at the home of President George Washington and First Lady Martha Washington in Philadelphia, and the city sued. In February, U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, ruled that the materials must be put back as the case works its way through the courts. She began her order with a quotation from George Orwell’s 1984, a novel based on the premise that an authoritarian regime constantly rewrote history for its own ends.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the erasure of American history in favor of a whitewashed authoritarianism. The American people began to preserve the truth of who we have been.

Volunteers worried at the potential loss of National Park Service information created the Save Our Signs project, a crowd-sourced archive of photographs from National Parks. Historians appalled by changes to the Smithsonian created Citizen Historians for the Smithsonian, similarly documenting changes to the Smithsonian. One of its leaders, James Millward, is a scholar of Chinese history and is concerned that “history being snipped and clipped and disappeared” looks a great deal like the methods of the Chinese Communist Party. Sitting next to Trump’s portrait in the Portrait Gallery, he handed visitors copies of the old text until guards closed the exhibit.

At the Organization of American Historians, the History, Archives, and Records Preservation Project (HARPP) is made up of historians, archivists, librarians, and their allies, who are recording “changes since January 2025 that threaten the historical record.”

Even more dramatically, though, today’s Americans are demanding the preservation not just of who we have been, but of who we are. Far from accepting the administration's whitewashed assertion that the nation has an “unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty, individual rights, and human happiness,” we are remembering our complicated history of community struggle and mobilizing to protect our right to govern ourselves against those who would take that right from us.

Millions of Americans and their allies turned out today for more than 3,100 “No Kings” events in all 50 states, U.S. territories, Washington, D.C., and towns and cities around the world in what appears to be the largest one-day protest in American history.

Instead of accepting the destruction of the true lessons of our past, we are bringing them back to life.

[Image I took at a No Kings rally today.]

03/26/2026
02/03/2026

The USDA Forest Service, Green Mountain & Finger Lakes National Forests is hiring TWO summer archaeological technician interns at $20/hour for 720 hours (18 weeks). The position will run from the end of May through the end of September and is based out of Mendon, Vermont. The position is being advertised through preservenet.org as a National Council for Preservation Education (NCPE) internship. Current students and those who have graduated within the past 12 months are eligible to apply.

The application deadline is February 26, 2026 and the position details are listed in the job posting: https://preservenet.org/job/national-park-service-ncpe-internship-program-mendon-vt-internship-ncpe-internship-archaeology-technician-intern-720-hours/

Housing will be provided for at the Mount Tabor Work Center seasonal housing facility in Mt Tabor, Vermont. The government facility offers a single or double occupancy room, with a shared bathroom, kitchen, laundry, and living area with other Green Mountain National Forest interns and seasonals.

02/02/2026

There's no way the Chimney Point woodchuck was going to come out of his/her warm burrow and through the snow this morning (at minus 8 degrees) to see if spring is coming in six weeks or not. Here he/she is in slightly warmer times. Happy Groundhog Day everyone from the Vermont State Historic Sites! (photo of woodchuck at Chimney Point State Historic Site, Addison, VT)

Address

594 Indian Trl
Leicester, VT
05733

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when GEOARCH, Inc. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share