08/17/2021
A good piece of reporting. The Wolcott Group does not engage in this kind of work.
We have conducted and continue to do coalition building, as well as public outreach and education campaigns. The objectives here have been (a) to share important information with key audiences, including the news media and (b) to increase general understanding of important issues.
We will brief neighborhood groups, elected officials, and others on behalf of a client to make sure of two key things: (a) they have a chance to get "our" side of the story and the facts about a project or program and (b) to allow interested parties to ask questions.
Have we asked groups or individuals to attend public meetings or provide written comments? Yes. However, we don't pay them to do that. If they are passionate about a subject, we encourage them to share that with decision-makers. We also encourage them to disclose that they have met with "our" side, and they have thoroughly examined the issue from both angles. At the end of the day, honesty, disclosure and transparency will rule.
We obviously represent organizations that have a key interest in the outcome. Too often, however, we have seen decisions made based on emotions, partial information or an orchestrated (sometimes well-funded) effort funded by opponents. As public relations, public affairs strategists, we are obligated to ensure the public, affected individuals and groups, a neighborhood, elected officials and the news media have a comprehensive picture, all the facts and all the background. We go to great lengths to share information, hold forums, get feedback and more. Some projects and programs we have been involved in have actually changed or been modified based on public feedback.
Residents around the ports of L.A. and Long Beach were paid to show support for natural gas trucks at community hearings.