05/27/2026
๐ฐ We've spent more than $3,000,000 on social media addiction ads on Meta.
โ๏ธ After the verdicts that found social platforms liable for harm to minors, Meta quietly started disapproving ads from firms hunting for those exact victims โ across the board.
The part most firms miss until it's too late: by the time your in-house marketer notices on Monday, you've already lost two weeks of intake. And if that ad account also runs your mass tort, your PI, your local work? One disapproval pattern can cascade and put ALL of it at risk.
๐ That's not a marketer problem. That's a workload problem.
One person, no matter how sharp, cannot:
> Monitor disapproval patterns across dozens of ad sets in real time
> Rewrite creative the same day to scrub "Meta," "Facebook," and "Instagram" without breaking message-market fit
> Stand up firewalled ad accounts to isolate risk before a full shutdown
> Pivot spend to Google, TikTok, and influencer simultaneously
And still run the rest of your marketing
Your in-house person is overworked, underfunded, and under-supported. The platform changed the rules overnight. You can't outwork the new rules with one human.
๐ข We're running 9 active social media harm campaigns right now. We've deployed more than $3,000,000 toward this litigation over the last few years.
We saw the disapprovals coming, restructured account architecture to firewall the risk, rewrote every ad to talk about "social media" broadly without naming the platform, and opened Google PPC, TikTok, and influencer the same week disapprovals spiked.
That's not heroics. That's just the new floor.
โHow does your team manage changes in the ad landscape?