09/12/2026
Before the Playground: Canton’s Plum Street Cemetery
There are places in Stark County where you don’t need to add a ghost story to make the history worth looking into. McKinley Park in Canton is one of them.
The park has a playground listed among its amenities. But the ground has a history that goes back long before its use as a recreation area. Canton Parks & Recreation
This was once Plum Street Cemetery, also known as McKinley Cemetery. The historical sign titled McKinley Avenue Park, donated by the Southwest Association of Neighbors, dates its establishment as a public graveyard to 1805. An account published by the McKinley Presidential Library & Stark County Archives states that Canton’s founder, Bezaleel Wells, gave the cemetery land to the city in 1808. Those dates may refer to separate events, but that needs to be checked against the original records.
A photographed cemetery record identifies the site as cemetery No. 132 under the names McKinley Park, Myers, Plum Street, and Wells Cemetery. It also states that all but one stone had been removed when the record was compiled, although the date of that record is not visible in the photograph. Those additional names give us more ways to search for records that might otherwise be missed.
According to the sign, City Engineer Mr. Reif and Assistant Engineer Fouts surveyed the cemetery in 1896 and counted 128 graves. They believed there were more because some markers had deteriorated, been destroyed, or been carried away. That makes 128 a recorded count, not a reliable total of everyone buried there.
The sign places the park conversion in 1897. It describes gravestones being lowered into the ground and most of the stones covered with 336 wagonloads of dirt hauled from street work. Some remaining gravestones were temporarily re-erected. The archives account also states that some graves were moved to West Lawn Cemetery while other remains and markers were covered over. The number of people still buried there was unknown. McKinley archives
That detail deserves attention. Saying a cemetery was “removed” can leave people with the impression that everyone buried there was moved somewhere else. The historical account describes something much more troubling.
The sign also references a May 9, 1897, Canton Repository article describing human bones uncovered during street work along the cemetery’s southern edge. According to the account reproduced on the sign, the remains were collected and reburied elsewhere within the cemetery. That gives us a specific newspaper issue to examine, rather than relying on a story with no traceable source.
Questions about using the land continued afterward. The sign describes an Aero Club proposal to launch gas-filled balloons from the property in 1900 and a later effort to obtain title to the land. It reports that a court upheld its use as a graveyard. It also describes a city purchase in 1912 and a later city solicitor’s position that the original cemetery designation still applied. These are details from the sign’s historical account; the underlying court and property records still need to be examined before drawing conclusions about the site’s legal status today.
One person believed to remain there is Jacob Nagle, a Revolutionary War veteran and sailor who traveled extensively, including aboard the First Fleet to Australia. He died in Canton in 1841 and was buried near the Webb family plot. The archives report that his name does not appear in the record of people removed from the cemetery. They consider it likely that his remains are still there, although that is not a confirmed identification of his present burial location. McKinley archives
The sign also contains a list headed “Known graves still remaining in the park as of 2006.” Among those listed are Margaret Miller, who died in 1810; Barbara Shriver, 1817; Adam Rex, 1818; John Augustine, 1835; Dr. John Sala, 1851; and Henry Miller, 1852. It includes Mary Ann Kryder and Anna Eliza Kryder, both listed as dying in 1823. The entry for O.H. Kline, who died in 1845, identifies his marker as still standing at the time. These are names and dates recorded on the sign, not a new survey confirming the location of each person’s remains today.
Think about that for a moment. Behind a name in an old burial record is an entire life. Someone had a family, worked, traveled, struggled, and eventually had people gather to say goodbye. That matters to me when I research a location. The people connected to it deserve more consideration than becoming characters in somebody’s ghost story.
From a paranormal research standpoint, this is a location that raises questions. A former cemetery, even one where remains were reportedly left behind, does not automatically establish a haunting. The sources cited here document history; they do not establish paranormal activity.
Before calling any experience evidence, I want to know what happened, under what conditions, and what ordinary explanations were considered. Knowing the history can help guide research, but it can also influence what someone expects to experience. We have to be honest about both.
For me, the reason to write about this place starts with remembering the people connected to it. Any investigation should follow that same respect. These were human beings, and whatever someone believes about the paranormal, their burial ground deserves to be treated with that in mind.
Changing what a piece of land is used for does not erase what happened there.
Its paranormal reputation is much less clearly documented, if there even is any. MPRA will have to do more research on this location in the near future, looking further into its history and any firsthand accounts of unexplained activity. Before drawing conclusions, we need to see what can actually be supported.