What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 6pm Tuesday 8am - 6pm Wednesday 8am - 6pm Thursday 8am - 6pm Friday 8am - 6pm

CPCON Group, 80 Broad Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY (2026)

09/01/2026

What happens when your physical assets don’t match your fixed asset records?

A fixed asset reconciliation can reveal several types of discrepancies: an asset may still exist in the register but no longer be physically present; equipment may be found in the field without a corresponding record; an asset may have moved without its location being updated; or depreciation parameters may no longer match the information recorded in the system.

Each case requires a different resolution path.

Ghost assets may require investigation of disposal and transfer records before an approved retirement is posted. Unrecorded assets require supporting documentation, classification, useful-life assessment, and, when applicable, capitalization. Location discrepancies require record updates and an investigation into how the movement occurred. Depreciation variances require recalculation and correction of the underlying parameters.

This is why physical verification is only one part of fixed asset reconciliation. The discrepancies identified in the field need to be investigated, documented, approved, and reflected in the fixed asset register and accounting records.

A well-executed reconciliation strengthens fixed asset data accuracy, internal controls, audit readiness, depreciation records, and financial reporting — while giving management a more reliable view of the assets the organization actually owns and uses.

Found discrepancies between your physical assets and your records? Send us a message.

08/27/2026

How do you prepare fixed asset data for ERP integration?

A reliable ERP asset database starts with a structured process for turning physical asset information into validated, system-ready data.

For asset-intensive organizations, this process connects what exists across facilities and operations with the information used by finance, accounting, maintenance, and asset management teams.

At CPCON Group, our asset data integration process follows four key stages.

First, asset information is collected and mapped according to the ERP structure, required fields, and business rules. The dataset then goes through validation and data cleansing to improve integrity, standardization, and consistency.

Once validated, the information is transformed into the formats and structures required by the ERP environment. The final stage combines ERP integration and reconciliation, verifying that the information was successfully incorporated and providing reports to support the results.

The outcome is a more consistent connection between physical assets, fixed asset records, and enterprise systems, creating a stronger data foundation for financial reporting, physical inventory, asset lifecycle management, audits, maintenance planning, and capital decisions.

Under standard project conditions, this process can move from asset data collection to a consistent, ERP-ready database in an average of 2–4 weeks.

For organizations preparing an ERP implementation, migration, fixed asset reconciliation, or asset data cleanup project, this creates a clear path for structuring the information before it becomes part of the enterprise system.

Want to understand how this process could work for your asset environment? Send us a message.

*Average timeline based on standard project conditions. Actual delivery time may vary depending on project scope, asset volume, data quality, ERP requirements, system access, and client-side dependencies.

08/25/2026

Which industries benefit most from EAM–ERP reconciliation, and why?

EAM–ERP reconciliation is especially important in asset-intensive industries where operational and financial records need to provide a consistent view of the physical asset base.

An Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system supports maintenance, equipment hierarchy, location, condition, and operational history. An Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system provides the financial perspective, including capitalization, depreciation, cost centers, and net book value.

EAM–ERP reconciliation connects these perspectives with physical assets, strengthening data consistency across operations, finance, and asset management.

In energy and utilities, this alignment supports financial and regulatory processes, including rate base calculations for FERC-regulated utilities.

In oil and gas, reconciliation connects detailed equipment and component hierarchies in the EAM with capitalized asset units in the ERP, improving visibility across complex asset structures.

In manufacturing, replacements, upgrades, relocations, and maintenance interventions continuously change production lines. Reconciliation keeps operational and financial asset information aligned with the current plant configuration.

In healthcare, medical equipment may be managed through clinical engineering systems and recorded in the hospital’s financial ERP. Reconciliation connects the physical equipment with its operational and fixed asset records.

Across these industries, EAM–ERP reconciliation creates a reliable connection between physical assets, operational data, and financial records throughout the asset lifecycle.

This integrated foundation strengthens fixed asset management, physical inventory, maintenance planning, financial reporting, audit readiness, capital planning, and asset data governance.

08/20/2026

An asset can cease to exist physically long before it disappears from the accounting records.

Consider a piece of equipment replaced during maintenance. Operations continue with the new component, but the change may not flow through the entire asset management process. Or consider equipment transferred between facilities: physically, it is already at a new location, while the fixed asset register still assigns it to the previous one.

There are also less visible situations. A system migration can create duplicate records. An asset may reach the end of its useful life, be removed from service, and still remain on the register. In componentized asset structures, significant parts may be replaced while the recorded configuration continues to represent a physical reality that has already changed.

This is how many ghost assets emerge: operations evolve, and each change needs to be properly reflected in the fixed asset register.

Over time, these occurrences can accumulate and affect processes that rely on asset data, including insurance, depreciation, physical verification, audits, and capital planning.

That is why identifying a ghost asset also means investigating which lifecycle event was not properly reflected in the records. An undocumented transfer requires a different response from a duplicate entry, an unprocessed disposal, or a component replacement.

This perspective turns ghost asset identification into useful information for strengthening controls, update workflows, and asset traceability.

The better an organization understands how these discrepancies arise, the greater its ability to keep physical reality and fixed asset records aligned over time.

08/18/2026

How confident are you that your fixed asset register reflects what actually exists across your operations?

Fixed asset verification provides the evidence needed to answer that question.

The process begins with a defined scope and the existing fixed asset register. From there, assets are physically located and identified, with information such as tag number, description, serial number, location, and condition verified in the field.

That physical evidence is then reconciled with the accounting records. This is where the organization can identify ghost assets, assets found in the field but missing from the register, as well as discrepancies involving location, custody, identification, or condition.

The findings create a structured basis for investigating differences, updating records, processing necessary retirements or adjustments through the appropriate approval workflows, and supporting finance teams, auditors, and other stakeholders with stronger evidence.

Fixed asset verification is therefore part of a continuous control process. Each verification cycle improves the reliability of asset information and provides a stronger baseline for the next one.

We break down the process into four stages: scope definition, field verification, data reconciliation, and resolution and reporting.

08/11/2026

Is your asset management built around isolated processes or an integrated lifecycle?

Effective asset management rarely depends on a single process. The quality of asset information is built throughout the entire asset lifecycle, from acquisition to disposal, through a series of processes that directly influence the reliability of financial reporting, operational efficiency, and decision-making.

When one of these processes fails to operate consistently, the impact can be felt across the organization. Outdated records, inaccurate depreciation, audit challenges, less effective capital planning, and reduced asset traceability often share the same root cause: a lack of integration between the processes that support asset managemen

In this carousel, we highlight seven essential processes for building an end-to-end asset management framework:

• Asset creation and capitalization;
• Asset movement control;
• Asset transfers;
• Physical asset verification;
• Asset revaluation;
• Asset retirement and disposal;
• Long-term asset planning.

When these processes operate as an integrated lifecycle, organizations strengthen the quality of their asset information and establish a more reliable foundation for financial, operational, and strategic decision-making.

08/06/2026

Is technology accelerating your reconciliation process, or transforming it?

Fixed asset reconciliation is no longer limited to spreadsheets and manual verification. Advances in asset management technology have fundamentally changed how organizations validate physical assets, reconcile financial records, and maintain accurate asset registers.

Solutions such as RFID, mobile applications, ERP integration, and advanced analytics reduce manual effort while improving data quality, traceability, and visibility across the entire reconciliation process.

In this post, we highlight four technologies that are helping organizations modernize fixed asset reconciliation:

• RFID technology for high-speed asset identification;
• Mobile applications for field data collection;
• ERP integration for synchronized asset information;
• Analytics and reporting for continuous monitoring and decision support.

When these technologies operate as part of an integrated asset management strategy, reconciliation becomes a reliable source of information for financial reporting, maintenance planning, and strategic decision-making.

08/04/2026

EAM–ERP reconciliation is one of the most important processes for organizations that rely on accurate and consistent information about their physical assets.

Although both systems manage data related to the same asset base, they serve different purposes. Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) focuses on operational information, such as maintenance history, asset location, and equipment condition, while Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) manages financial data, including acquisition cost, depreciation, net book value, and cost centers.

When these systems stop evolving in sync, discrepancies begin to emerge that can affect the quality of information used for audits, financial reporting, capital planning, maintenance management, and asset analysis. The purpose of reconciliation is to identify those discrepancies, validate the physical existence and condition of assets, and establish a reliable connection between operational and financial records.

A structured reconciliation process typically includes six key steps:

• Extract data from both EAM and ERP systems;
• Identify the links between corresponding records;
• Conduct a physical asset inventory;
• Reconcile the physical inventory with EAM and ERP records;
• Resolve identified discrepancies;
• Establish an ongoing synchronization process between both systems.

Ultimately, reconciliation creates a more reliable asset information foundation to support financial.

07/30/2026

IFRS 16 and GASB 87 establish different requirements for the recognition, measurement, and management of lease agreements. Understanding these distinctions is essential for structuring business processes, integrating information, and maintaining compliance throughout the entire lease lifecycle.

The applicable accounting standard shapes how lease portfolios are managed. Requirements related to initial recognition, subsequent measurement, reassessments, discount rates, right-of-use (ROU) assets, and available exemptions influence processes that extend beyond financial reporting, supporting internal controls, technology integration, and information governance.

Differences between the standards also influence process design and technology decisions. Lease agreements, asset records, ERP platforms, and lease accounting systems must operate from a consistent information framework to ensure that renewals, modifications, reassessments, and contract terminations are reflected accurately and in accordance with regulatory requirements.

A well-structured implementation strengthens lease governance across the organization. Integrating information, business processes, and cross-functional teams improves the reliability of financial reporting, supports audit readiness, and provides greater visibility into the management of leased assets and related obligations throughout the contract lifecycle.

07/28/2026

Implementing IFRS 16 and GASB 87 extends well beyond the accounting recognition of right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities. A consistent implementation depends on an organization's ability to identify lease agreements, consolidate information, integrate systems, and maintain effective controls throughout the entire lease lifecycle.

Centralizing lease agreements creates a single source of truth for the lease accounting process, reducing information fragmentation across departments and improving the identification of agreements that remain outside the primary reporting environment. In many implementation projects, this initial assessment uncovers leases that were not included in the original accounting population.

Integrating lease accounting platforms, ERP systems, and asset management solutions improves the consistency of information used for initial recognition, subsequent measurement, reassessments, lease modifications, and reconciliations. Reducing manual data transfers also minimizes operational effort and helps prevent inconsistencies across multiple systems.

Maintaining reliable lease records also requires the physical verification of right-of-use assets, supported by structured processes for renewals, term revisions, payment changes, lease modifications, and contract terminations. Keeping this information current is essential to maintaining ongoing compliance with IFRS 16 and GASB 87.

Coordinating finance, accounting, asset management, procurement, legal, IT, and operations teams strengthens information governance, supports audit readiness, and improves the reliability of financial reporting. Each function contributes to the creation, management, and maintenance of lease information throughout the contract lifecycle.

A successful implementation of these standards is built on more than accounting compliance alone. It requires strong governance, integrated data, standardized processes, and reliable information to support accurate lease accounting, regulatory compliance, and informed business decisions throughout the lease lifecycle.

CPCON Group

09/01/2026

08/27/2026

08/25/2026

08/20/2026

08/18/2026

08/11/2026

08/06/2026

08/04/2026

07/30/2026

07/28/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request

Monday	8am - 6pm
Tuesday	8am - 6pm
Wednesday	8am - 6pm
Thursday	8am - 6pm
Friday	8am - 6pm