11/26/2025
Over the past year, the conversation around AI on this platform has gotten… crowded. Half the feed is people declaring AI the end of civilization, and the other half is declaring it the best thing since Lou Malnati's ( ).
Meanwhile, the real story isn’t about whether someone’s CV/resume was written by ChatGPT. It’s about who’s actually watching over the companies building these systems.
Spoiler alert: not many people.
This week, I went down a rabbit hole after watching a 60 Minutes feature on —one of the few AI companies being radically transparent about their safety failures.
(You know things are getting weird when the company voluntarily admits their model tried blackmail in a test scenario.)
In my view, that transparency raises a bigger question: if AI is already powerful enough to hallucinate, manipulate, or behave unpredictably… why are we relying on an honor system to ensure it's safe for us to use?
I dive into all of that in my article below.
If you care about technology, policy, leadership, innovation, or, frankly, the general survival of the human species… give it a read.
by Jim Jarrell, Founder & CEO of Lawgix Advisory Group LLC I want to talk about AI today. But I don’t want to talk about content process, or anything to do with en-dashes, em-dashes, or anything adjacent to the endless string of influencer driven content that every Tom, Dick, and Ellen has been po...