09/15/2026
We were one of the first companies to trademark the strain name of a bacteria.
Sounds strange to say out loud. But at Ganeden, from an IP perspective, it mattered more than almost anything else we did.
Probiotics are a strange category to protect.
You can’t patent a naturally occurring organism. And once you publish clinical research, that research is public. Anyone can read it, anyone can cite it.
That created a problem for us.
Once BC30 had real published data behind it, other companies started citing our trials to support their own probiotic ingredients. But two strains can look identical on a Certificate of Analysis, share the same genus and species, and behave completely differently once they're actually in a product.
So we did something most ingredient companies hadn’t thought to do...
We trademarked the strain designation itself.
BC30's actual name is Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086. That designation, not just the brand name “BC30", became a trademarked, defensible identity. It let us say, clearly and legally: this specific research is about this specific strain. Not the genus. Not the species. This one strain and only this one strain.
Once that was in place, enforcement got simple.
I’m not a guy who sends letters from lawyers.
I just pick up the phone. "Hey, your folks are using our clinical data to support your product claims but you know that’s not how it works. Clinical data is strain specific and the clinicals were not performed using your strain, so if you could stop doing that we would appreciate it."
No formal notice. No escalation. Just a direct conversation, one operator to another. And we never had an argument about it.
Most founders wait until a real threat shows up to think about what’s defensible in their business.
By then, it’s usually more expensive and a lot less simple.
It’s one of the many things we consider when we evaluate a business.
Contact us if you want advice from people who have been through it all before.