Lucky Day

Lucky Day Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Lucky Day, Consulting Agency, 3 Sugar Creek Center Boulevard, Sugar Land, TX.

Check out our post on
09/28/2015

Check out our post on

Remebering the Flixborough Explosion http://conta.cc/1KG71Pk
06/01/2015

Remebering the Flixborough Explosion http://conta.cc/1KG71Pk

The Flixborough explosion was a watershed event. Reactor #5 in a series of 6 large stirred tank reactors had to be removed for maintenance at the Nypro Chemical Plant. To allow production to continue at reduced rates, a temporary 20" bypass was installed to bridge the gap between reactors 4 and 6. A…

PHA/HAZOP Training in HoustonMonarch SMS has spaces available in upcoming PHA/HAZOP training courses in Houston, Texas. ...
05/16/2015

PHA/HAZOP Training in Houston
Monarch SMS has spaces available in upcoming PHA/HAZOP training courses in Houston, Texas. Our course offering includes a 2-day course aimed at anyone wanting to improve their skills in this important safety took - engineers, operators, supervisors and others that may attend PHAs. A 1-day extension is also available that focuses on leadership skills (must attend the 2-day course to quality for the leadership extension).

Having completed the full 3-day training, we also offer a certification process for leaders, during which we will assess your leadership skills and provide coaching and feedback, culminating in award of our leadership certificate.

Courses will run in the uptown / Galleria area in July, September and December.

For more information visit http://tinyurl.com/kyyefvs

Monarch Safety and Management Services

Best practice management of the interface between a high pressure system and a low pressure system continues to escape s...
05/05/2015

Best practice management of the interface between a high pressure system and a low pressure system continues to escape some sites. Here is a one page summary of the issue.

05/03/2015

When you have serious symptoms of illness and no explanation, do you (a) go to the Internet and search the Web for a diagnosis and treatment plan, or (b) go to a medical professional? While the Internet is great for general information about a wide range of topics, most sensible, common sense people will seek professional help when sick.

So why is it that so many people seems to turn to the Internet to self-diagnose problems with safety on their process plants? LinkedIn, for example, is a great place to ask questions of like-minded professionals to help understand specific issues, but a terrible place for the inexperienced to get free advice on how to perform their own heart transplant. Yet time and again I find people asking questions that reveal major problem with the safety of their facilities, looking for a quick fix or free engineering services.

Beware! Free advice is most often worth exactly what you pay for it. Without a complete understanding of the problem, the person looking for an answer first phrases an incomplete question that most likely omits critical information. Anyone offering a response can only work with what they are given, so the relevance and usefulness of the answer is questionable at best.

If you have symptoms of poor safety on your facility, seek professional help. Someone that can work with you to diagnose the real problem and develop corrective actions that suit your needs, culture, and business objectives. Better to have a diagnosis of cancer early, when treatment can still cure it, than self-diagnose and self-treat until it is too late to prevent disaster.

Here's an option to consider: Monarch SMS offers a one day diagnostic site visit for a fixed fee, during which we can review documentation and plant facilities and meet with key personnel to identify problem areas and develop an improvement plan. A much better alternative than waiting for a plant explosion or serious injuries while trolling the Internet for free solutions.

04/16/2015

"SS Grandcamp" – 68 years later, what have we learned?

On 16 April, 1947, the "SS Grandcamp" cargo ship exploded while at harbor in Texas City, Texas. Best estimate is that 561 people died as a result of the explosion, with over 5,000 injured. Over 1,000 buildings in the area were leveled, while the blast broke windows in Houston, 40 miles away, and was felt over 200 miles away in Louisiana.

This is a defining event in the history of ammonium nitrate fertilizer handling and storage. The "SS Grandcamp" incident still ranks as the deadliest industrial accident in US history and one of the deadliest in the world.

The fire started in a hold around 8am. The hold next to that contained 2,300 tons of ammonium nitrate in bags. Firefighting efforts by volunteer firefighters and the ships’ crew were unable to contain or control the initial fire. The ship's captain ordered the hold to be sealed and steamed out in an effort to quench the fire – a reasonable technique for typical combustible fires, but one that did little to resolve the fire in the hold.

Around 9am, an hour after the fire started, the sea water outside the hold was observed to be boiling, while water sprayed onto the side of the ship was seen to vaporize instantly. Witnesses also report that the ship's deck was starting to bulge – likely due to a combination of extreme heat from the fire and pressure from the steam.

At 9:12am, with the firefighting efforts in full force, the nitrate in the hold detonated. The ship was destroyed and a huge blast wave rolled outwards. Everyone on board the ship and in the immediate vicinity, including 27 volunteer firefighters and a large crowd of spectators, was killed instantly. Many bodies were vaporized and the final death toll has never been determined with certainty. One of the ship's anchors, weighing 2 tons, landed 1.6 miles away. The blast wave and burning debris from the explosion caused widespread damage and secondary fires. One of these fires was aboard the "High Flyer", another ship loaded with ammonium nitrate, which detonated in the early hours of the following day, claiming at least two more lives and causing additional damage.

So what are some of the key Lessons from the "SS Grandcamp" explosion? First, this incident highlighted the fact, not widely understood at the time, that ammonium nitrate is explosive under the right conditions. While contamination with organic material is generally known to be a major risk factor, additional factors include moisture and pressure – both introduced by sealing and steaming the hold.

Second, the incident stresses the importance of knowing the hazards of materials being stored, transported or handled. Ships’ manifests today include extensive details, such as the information available in Safety Data Sheet. Safety data sheets include information on the hazards to safety, health and the environment, as well as information on the fire and explosion risks of the material and appropriate firefighting measures.

Third, the importance of emergency plans, which should include evacuation & exclusion zones for credible events as well as specific actions to be taken – or to be avoided – in dealing with an emergency.

The "SS Grandcamp" incident could have been avoided entirely by better storage and handling practices driven by a thorough understanding of the hazards. The death toll could have been avoided by an understanding of the potential consequences of a fire involving ammonium nitrate, which could have driven different techniques to combat the fire and prompt action to evacuate the area.

The "SS Grandcamp" was not the first major industrial accident involving ammonium nitrate. Another “classic” was the 1921 explosion in a fertilizer factory in Germany, which resulted in a similar death toll, left 6,500 people homeless, and a crater 65 feet deep by 300-400 feet across.

Unfortunately, Texas City was not the last accidental explosion involving ammonium nitrate due to fire. On 17 April, 2013, an explosion at a fertilizer redistribution facility in West, Texas, killed 15 people and injured more than 160, in addition to destroying an apartment building and damaging a nearby school and nursing home, among others. As with the Texas City event 66 years and one day prior, the West explosion started with a fire and claimed the lives of the brave volunteer firefighters attempting to deal with it.

Do you understand the hazards at your site or workplace? Do you know how to minimize the risks through good design and management? Finally, do you know how to best deal with credible emergencies, such as a fire or a loss of containment, without putting people in harm’s way? If you cannot answer all three with a solid “yes”, get help to find the answers. While Monarch SMS is available to help, you can also get a lot of excellent information from industry associations and your insurance carrier, to name just two sources.

Texas City Nitrate Explosion - Lessons Learned http://conta.cc/1FXdgfR
04/16/2015

Texas City Nitrate Explosion - Lessons Learned http://conta.cc/1FXdgfR

On 16 April, 1947, the SS Grandcamp cargo ship exploded while at harbor in Texas City, Texas. Best estimate is that 561 people died as a result of the explosion, with over 5,000 injured. Over 1,000 buildings in the area were leveled, while the blast broke windows in Houston, 40 miles away, and was f…

Monarch SMS News http://conta.cc/1yVCaVo
04/09/2015

Monarch SMS News http://conta.cc/1yVCaVo

If you followed a broken or out-of-date link, please inform the owner of the referring document. Email [email protected] to report this error or continue on the Constant Contact home page.

03/23/2015

Texas City - 10 years on.
On 23 March 2005, an explosion at the Texas City refinery, then operated by BP, claimed the lives of 15 people and injured 180 others. Apart from the loss of life, the incident cost the company well over $1 billion in direct and consequential losses.

The Texas City incident occurred due to a multitude of factors combining. Some of these factors include:
- lack of knowledge about the system;
- faulty instrumentation;
- poor planning - or lack of planning;
- pressure to get the plant back on line; and
- unclear responsibilities.

These factors combined to the plant being operated outside of design parameters, which in turn lead to a major release of flammable materials and the subsequent explosion.

This was not a failure of technology. According to the Chemical Safety Board, the "Texas City disaster was caused by organizational and safety deficiencies at all levels of the BP Corporation."

Has the industry learned from Texas City? If you are involved in operating a hazardous facility, have you taken the lessons to heart and applied them rigorously?

Like all industrial disasters, Texas City was avoidable.

03/21/2015

Pumps and Pumping 101:
When dealing with multiple pumps, refer to the curve for each pump, then:
- for pumps in series: add head at same flow rate.
- for pumps in parallel: add flow at same head.

Address

3 Sugar Creek Center Boulevard
Sugar Land, TX
77478

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Lucky Day posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share