08/11/2026
Every established profession has the same institution — a governing association, a licensing board, a bar, a college of medicine. They set standards, negotiate on behalf of the field, and keep decades of accumulated knowledge from disappearing. That work matters, and it only happens at scale.
But institutions are built to standardize, not to originate. Over time, the best ideas coming out of the membership get absorbed into a CLE credit, a CME module, a whitepaper — and the people who actually did the thinking move on. Members become consumers of the association's resources instead of generators of new ones.
A mastermind group solves a different problem. Small, non-competing peers at a similar scale, sharing real numbers and real failures with people who have no incentive to flatter them — and no institution to hand the insight off to. The ideas stay with the room that built them.
This isn't a new idea. Jefferson's Committee of Five drafted the Declaration of Independence with no charter and no budget, then dissolved once the work was done. Franklin's Junto ran for 38 years with no institution above it and built the first lending library in the colonies. Carnegie credited his own "master mind" of advisors — not his personal expertise — for his success.
We've spent years building this room for the bicycle, outdoor, and running industries. The same structural gap exists in medicine, law, finance — anywhere a real peer room hasn't been built yet.
What would it look like in your field?
Read the full piece 👇