08/31/2026
As university business professors, my colleagues and I have been wrestling with an important question:
๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ *๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ* ๐ฒ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐?
A recent Wall Street Journal article, "๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ'๐ตโ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฏ'๐ตโ๐๐ฐ ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ ๐ฐ๐ถ," (https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/when-ai-more-harm-than-good-519a83e7?st=BhRVT3&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink) offers a perspective that resonated with me. Its central message isn't that AI is good or badโit's that **wisdom lies in knowing where AI belongs and where human judgment must remain in charge.**
Our students should absolutely learn to use AI to:
โ
Brainstorm ideas
โ
Analyze data
โ
Organize information
โ
Draft and refine their thinking
But they also need to develop the uniquely human capabilities that AI cannot replace:
โข Critical thinking
โข Ethical judgment
โข Empathy
โข Creativity
โข Leadership
โข The ability to ask the *right* questions
In my classes, I'm becoming less interested in whether students used AI and more interested in **how** they used it.
Did AI replace their thinkingโor did it amplify it?
The graduates who thrive won't be the ones who know the most prompts. They'll be the ones who combine AI's speed with human wisdom, curiosity, and sound judgment.
That's not just an AI skill. That's a leadership skill.
What do students think, are your professors moving you in the right direction?