03/07/2021
Brnovich v DNC... ..for overturn of LWV v Pennsylvania(charter plantations), for the greater good of all women and caucusing democracies...
Marbury v Madison or...
Don’t Come Crying To Me...
Pith and Marrow or...
Constitution and Declaration...
Gerrymandering...
LWV v Pennsylvania...Davis v Bandemer
Roe v Wade... women's sovereignty...
Questions as to precedents' enduring application of principles, in an age of advancing women's sovereignty, medical interventionism & predation, religious & shamenistic decline.....And the approaching medical and election cases on the horizon from 2020... that appear as more a test of convention and than adaptation... as we have seemingly awoken a plague married to a pandemic of drug addiction... over the course of a century...
Trapped by Marshall between a yet unsettled past & revisionism and the st******nt on the horizon, as terror grips... for rational and moral guidance that may not always hold course for idealism, but for survival... will the court continue to wait hundreds of years... for division and corrupt power to settle with law, the battle for the soul of the nation... too easily manipulated by plutocratic media thinktanks’ violent coersion... will the court act as an anchor to the past principle dragging us down into a global flood OR... clearly act where other branches have not... to respond to siege tactics and fashion through grounded precedent a new foundation in the sky, lest we hang from the bottom of the ocean in tempest tost waters...
The fashioning of this foundation or ark should command more from the principles of our Declaration of Independance with inclusion... of those selectively edited out by our constitution...amended later in *footnotes...
Shall every case not be a test of abilities to think profoundly, interpret wisely, and act swiftly to sustain liberty eternally...
The court should question more peripherally from approaching case law 'turning on a dime' to reach the crests on the horizon that will soon darken the skies... working steadfastly in concert with the other branches, not always the ' fiddler on the roof ' amid a sea of sorrow... a process of reformation must come to a foot... to change for the better those institutions that symbolize vaguely, their principles and ideals of enshrinement... commanding meager respect to a menagerie of indulgences... with a rotting floor... does little to achieve an audience when women & people of colour, nearly 3/5th's of this nation, were selectively disposed of... between wars and insurections... between our independance and constitutional convention... Where amendments have made clear through sufferage, that this document is neither perfect nor human...legal doctrine must always find future root in the commonlaw, perhaps referencing concordance with principles, ideals, and justifications... but as a court of action, not philosophy, should we endevour to always seek to understand and maintain communion with the people...
Landmark cases are a breath of fresh air in a rotten potatoe cellar...but, a Declaration of Justice is an ARK... free and independant over the sea of nations, like a hanging garden... oasis of cornucopia, as a beacon or lighthouse to LIBERTY...
Our Courts of Law do not represent a balance of powers, but a late-check that bounces & warns of it's own impeachable impotence, since Marshall's Marbury v Madison... corrupt power that thows-back progress for Congressional debauchery, division & debate, in the process of taxing & extorting the people, before once again being scalped of their sovereignty by the Executive... this elite system of predation seldom wants for foot-soldiers it can draft, while Quartering imperialist units of domestic and foreign asymmetrical warfare... the Declaration is the Spirit and the Constitution the Cage...
De Minimus avec Maximum
Outcome & Opportunity...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2020/19-1257
United States Supreme Court hears...
Brnovich v DNC...
ARIZONA et al VS. DNC et al...
In this Election Rights Integrity suit for amends to...
Strict adherance to precinct jurisdictional prohibitions against voting outside of geographically defined limits as to one's residency & voter registration... AND... the prohibition of harvesting or collection of mail-in early or absentee ballots by third parties... outside of strict USPS mailing and legally provided boxes...
Here before the Court lies a case tested by an expanded protection of the Federal Voting Rights Act 1982 Section 2... which states that the abridgment or denial of protections to the means of voting by legislation, policy, or unusual standards... would violate or conflict with federal supremacy until judicial review relieved the petitioners of the burden of proof...
Before the court, the State of Arizona enjoined by the RNC... presented the necessary evidence in briefs and oral arguments... to clearly demonstrate that neither did in person precinct provisional limitations, nor... mail-absentee ballot collections-havesting prohibitions violate the most inclusive or exclusive polarities of the Federal Voting Rights Act...
Either by proximate cause of legislative intent, nor... as a failure to modify strictures of polling place procedures to be more inclusive where newer technology might be argued to permit...
The Dole Compromise of the 1982 Section 2 Provision as shown...
https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/01/us/compromise-likely-on-voting-rights.html..gives common law standard of weighing the merits of arguments before the court... and held in the lower District Court, that beyond lax statistical abstracts with limited or null impacts... marginal standards with demonstrated or proven evidence of fraud... would require higher standards that protect... voter intent to ‘voluntarily’ cast their ballots, where clear collection efforts maintained by third parties sought to leverage collectivized risks and legal suceptibility, against their individual security or by coercive means of enticement to surrender their ballots to outside parties.....and the longheld standard of jurisdictional precinct protections against corruption of their local elections or verification procedures for higher offices, statewide, and federal... that might jeopardize their record, reputation, or auditing qualifications... to the expense of invalidating all parties...
The Voting Rights Act, which in all of its revised forms, reaches towards an ideal of language construction that seeks to remove bias... however hypothetical and historical the arguments presented here, on all sides and from the bench, did little to shore up the achievements of the legislation and revelled in the racially charged and geographically misplaced standards... that did little to demonstrate concern to obvious disproportionate outcomes and opportunities that actually have more root in failures of USSC precedent than in current legislative defense...
For parties that continue to seek exception as Native Americans, for the elderly or infirmed to actually seek legal, verifiable aid from objective or 'interested' representative parties, and the grandmother of them all... discrimination and intimidation of women voters... from registration, through harvesting... these communities fail to gain representative expression in the demographics of congress and other elected offices... due to partisan and afrocentric gerrymandering which heavily favor the lost causes of the democrats to ‘champion and suppress’ disempowered minorities & women... with rhetoric of intimidation, so vast... that entire psychological compendiums have been versed in the mythos of robinhood-romanticism & stockholm syndrome, that exhonerates ‘victimhood' from the piracy of the masses... not only has our common law perpetuated the internalization and justification of discrimination based on race against women & natives... falsley applying "de minimus" to the maximum... of demographic exploitation... but, the shadowy hand of death that reaches from the grave has reduced dead, disabled, mentally impaired, and the socially castrated block of seniors (also women...)... into a basket of deplorables and lies... where last rights seem to be the only protected spiritual counsel... where the political science of "lies, more lies, and statistics" does accurately frame USSC precedent that seeks too often to COWER behind an anti-activist federalism that castrates the constitutional protections from which their power derives...
Not since Marbury vs Madison or... Dredd Scott... has the court gone beyond expectations and dissapointed so much... but, as till now... in the present reality with the future before them... waiting for at least some greater response to these meager arguments AND...with the church still operating as the censured moral authority... to which no legal custody be granted so long as the justices profess secular supremacy over natural law...
If the court maintains or demures to the petitioners on the side of the law it will give little affect to the cause of justice, to which they are promised, if they do not at least... seek exception for natives in their wise shamanistic reclusiveness... for the elderly & infirmed whose periodic suspension from rolls or whose legal advisement(spiritual counsel) might be reciprocated & facilitated... and by greater grace from above, protect the nest of domesticated women who have yet the courage, wits, or ilk...to stand for their sovereign and unique representation to which no man can muster even the faintest surity of what a woman thinks, feels, or knows is right, when it comes to political survival...
This long harping of afro-centrism that has only helped blacks to misrepresent themselves with obscure jurisdictions, odd-couple political marriages..., and alienation from other minorities, that the NAACP and the late Justice Marshall represented... especially in this case where Kagan has argued this case from the bench in an activist vein to the ‘exclusion of the Latino’ parties actually represented... just does not comport with the facts.. of the means, times and places of the facilitated voting rights protections that ARIZONA doth seek to defend... and establish as 'precedent', to ensure the will of the voter to be protected as self governing, through representation that reflects black women & black men as equally as one would seek to represent all s*xes, ages, colors, and creeds...
for this reason we seek amends to overturn the minimal findings of the LWV v Pennsylvania... To establish that a presuposition or institutional predjudice does exist for 'legacy partisan favour' to gerrymander...where natural rights of men & women should be the prevailing concern... where in the course of electoral history it has been demonstrated that women have completely justified their rights, candidacy, and abilities enough... to at least afford them their sovereignty for representation to the federal offices which they seek...
Why is this the f**t and proper case to throw against the wall like limp spaghetti... to see if it sticks...
Do these institutional provisions fail the voter to protect themselves from fraud... NO... BUT FOR... lack of more of the same... ..or does the legal representation of limits to the vote provisions deny or abridge their political voice in a way that that does not seek to protect from misinformation or misrepresentation of the individual within the jurisdiction... were one to accept that the precinct, jurisdiction, district, county, or state lines were correct...NO.....The great outstanding fact of institutional discrimination of the case is that “not all counties have early vote centers”... BUT FOR... lack of more of the same... should this facilitate subjective vote harvesting advice & consent by third parties where the state has failed...NO... .. OR... will the state be forced to maintain equal facilities & access at a cost to their state budget...YES
{¿ In precinct voting should not resolve to manipulate tenuous electronic security through pollbooks... which only represents redundant security against intimidation & fraud... as a defense Electronic GPS has pin-point accuracy... for your polling locations...which the polls will help you find ?}
Vote Harvesting is not ‘mobile voting facilities’...NOR is it... a broad non-geographic free association caucus AND... guarantee for women’s protection under the violence against women act... could, through their State Attorney General register women to vote in a ‘single P.O. Box for women's shelters in the state’... non-gerrymanderable and acting only upon free association for self-representation(indivisible by outside forces)...
However, one may argue that those lines are incorrect within their time; ...whether given standing to do so may be limited by contempt... but a fair argument in terms of hypothetical/realities might permit the conjecture that the USSC is burried in malarky of their own precedents, emasculated of their Federal Marshalls... and lack the will to do justice to their name... let alone the aged-women, children, & natives that will be swept under the red carpet on the path to open ‘cartel civil war’ in these next few years...
Protecting the right of others to vote for white men is really not to different from white men representing themselves... if you don't fix the jurisdictions & the districts to conform to NON-GEOGRAPHIC self-representing free association... the geographical predisposition of the Senate in the Constitution is an oxymoron if ever a paradox did exist... fit in its opportunity to represent one man & one woman from each state but... incapable of surrendering its authority amongst the multitudinous rainbow of free associating representative districts, when state lines surrender to federalism... as nothing more than incorporations... like the cities' business units that operate free from taxation... trapped in a self replicating tax-dumpster of jurisdiction on top of another jurisdiction, in denial of representation and republican democracy...from within judicial jurisdictional supremacy...
What does greater disservice here is that the minorities so confined in this system of 'love nests' & disempowered captivity... are blind to all the substandard "compelling" candidates out there who are misdirected by the jurisdictional lines to represent their opportunistic 50+% WASP constituency with those opposed... and vice versa... with 60+% white male outcome practically guaranteed...
Although turnout opportunity & outcomes have a direct correlation registering in the right district and working out of residency would require a national strategic index (CENSUS) to assure more than marginal representation with a hive identity politic...
BUT FOR... MORE OF THE SAME...
Peripherally, why aren't primary requirements for same-day voting maintained like election day... even if... It were 24/7 vote week primary or an 8 hour election holiday... and done such that a federal jurisdiction crossreference (CENSUS)would allow voting in only one jurisdiction...per election... instead of the multiple small to big primaries that ‘partisan voting machines’ and ballot initiatives operate between... when time manner and place are not regular and conforming to a voting right act normative guideline of ‘ONE CITIZEN, ONE VOTE’
Like Marshall again & again trapped by your ghost you doeth find yourself sued for feigning lax penmanship and an even weaker sword...While those gripped by the struggles of your delusion fight for a layman's opus to cure the world's ill of your rot...
Many of the questions from the Court are standards tests, that are triggering mechanisms or “thresholds” to present or argue standing either peripherally or marginally under Federal Civil Rights Voting Law... But do little to argue the supremacy of 'dependant clauses' to direct Constitutional mandate for Representative Districts delineated by State Legislature... To create open ended points of entry by third party or individuals into the chain of custody either in “error" or in contravention of established processes to maintain validity of ‘non-partisan or partisan observation & challenge boards' party to the review & verification of said chain of custody... When both challenged processes under state law require closed circuts from ‘Voter’ through proscribed manner to secure federal representation standards, to exclude signature of taint to the ballot box and subsequent tallying process...Unless one believes the federal standards have been arbitrarily drawn or directly drawn against established constitutional principle or redrawn by the states to discriminate or misrepresent the assurity of representation... akin to Gerrymandering Districts that deny or abridge the right to vote through unequally applied measure...
Questions of balance within precedents or underpinnings...
¿Ratcheting abridgement or contraction of opportunities?... because the harvesting process implementation failed to provide safeguards to abuse...not a prima facia denial...akin to polltaxes... or regressive limitation of sufferage to landclasses...
Opportunity v. Outcome?...historical & proportional demographic realities of 'racial' discriminaltion...? Instead... interpretation of s*x in place for racial... s*x being more distinguished as function of human diversity... race being only skin deep...women have overcome turnout with registration but, not the gerrymandering... even as the majority of the vote, women are the most disproportionately represented...perhaps racial & partisan gerrymandering have repressed expression of the will of the voter, to the exclusion of women, as less than a quarter of Congress as a whole...
Turnout $&$ Political Contributions are higher amongst women for pro-life appointments & legislation... but women are consistently registered & vote to a much higher degree of certainty than any other demographic... because of the League of Women Voters being a modern foundational suffragette platform augmented by the Susan B Anthony & Emily's List... which further suuports the claim of state legislative gerrymander replicated in federal representation...
Is Affirmative Action Voting Unconstitutional...?
{Title VI & VII... Race or Creed Discrimination of Employment or Federal Assistance... (& IX?)}
{Arlington v MHDC... *footnote 21intent/outcome...}
The Ubiquity of socio-economics & Recreation?
UBIOpportunity, other social services outreach, and full disclosure of grant opportunities to all citizens & residents... blind to official status, ‘is an abuse' overextending ‘senior citizens’ social security’ as a fundamental human right... Provided by who...? Regardless of criminal status...? Or SSI WORK CREDITS...? Does money grow on trees...?
Or is Under-Utilization as a function of education and class...? NO
Turnout & registration as a function of compelling initiatives & gravitating candidates pervades ... not curbing Voter ID into obscurity to permit or facilitate machine fraud... by partisan 3rd parties...who do nothing to actually increase political motivation or actualizing Dreams... This is an invalid proxy that fails to build good habits with the false promise that money grows on trees...
The ability to maintain representative government should require greater conventional changes to effect election policy... For Harvesting, Curing & Observation...to also be held accountable through FEC reqirements to impartiality and full disclosure... for independant 3rd parties... on par with challenging of signatures & intent...for Gaps within Intersectional Demographics activism, adjudication, & write-in enforcement...and where ‘free association Caucusing’ might cure abuse of democratic values...
Further where are the substantive arguments?...as to voter INTIMIDATION that radical violent extremeism's underground represents.... while voter suppresion arguments aren't being made against GOOGLE et al.... for high tech lynching...doxing or facilitation of vote harvesting harrasment, and intimidation as functions of third party intervention... without FEC protections, OR... voters voluntary selection of a postal delivery system... via USPS certified mail...? {CARTER-BAKER}
The system is turned on it's head, without legal status as to who can claim confinement or infirmity, as is similarly lax no-excuse absentee voting... AND... without a certified observation chain of custody for...FEC regulated USPS, to be further subsidized as a marginal vote process, or expanded further through early voting mobile units... the maximization of opportunities that do not disadvantage voters of security & full disclosure...will not be realized...
Spiva ‘Discrimination Exists’... But, it is up to the high court to accept the predjudice of their precedents in allowing Congress to treat Constitutional Amendments as a *footnote, for the court to act upon after injury... when arguing minority-majority cultural cleavage and hetero-homogeneus assimilation & exchange... realize this is a melting pot... and a charge should not be lead by yelling backwards... white or black...and we must call for the immediate future and peripheral present to be enjoined in a Declaration of Justice... ...for women's sovereignty and free association amongst men, abandoning the anti-federalist proposal that States could do anything but gerrymander for their own interests, the representation of citizens from within, to be represented in a federal convention as masters of their own destiny, free from the bonds of state incorporated servitude... The people's house is purposefully abusive to women & others because it is a direct replication of state legislative corporate governance... and the Senate is it's board of governors' elite proxy... As a melting pot of *footnotes, have we grown mature enough to recognize our personal differences as being separate from the institutional bonds AND... from there, will we see free association and the sovereignty of women as an opportunity to expand liberty... Overcoming factionalism and appreciate eachother’s spiritual communion amongst a spectrum of illumination...
https://youtu.be/fPWTUHBULjI
https://youtu.be/862fAkHW5aw
Citizens for a Better Arizona...NO
The LaFaro Video was considered admitting vulgar & abusive hearsay... further used to establish compounding the ‘justifications/ramifications’ of HB2023, originally introduced in the House and ‘sponsored’ by 's Senator Shooter, AND...was not considered motivating by the district court... as to proximate cause or intent... Do we the rely on 9th circut lies, more lies & Statistics
{¿...Mobile v Bolden(1980)... held... Disproportionate Effects absent Purposeful Discrimination is insufficient to establish a claim or racial discrimination...affecting voting...}
{Cat’s Paw Staub v Proctor... as applied to the proximate cause of HB2023...}..{Crawford v Washington(2004)...hearsay admissibility in criminal cases...via cross*xamination
[disagrees with lower court as to the reliability of the statement by the (victim) wife presumably testifying against her defendant husband...after possibly being s*xually assaulted](Ohio v Roberts)}...
Is this Doug Doucey OR the Impeachable Brian Kemp treating chicanos as Suburbia Dingos...
¿¿¿...Or like Pejoratives... equally applied to whites???'
{Dole 82...Amendments opportunities were provided for prophylaxis, as part of the legislative process, this was not an unconstitutional executive denial or abridgement...}
Latinos need greater registration drives as do all of us... selectivity of third parties "get out the vote drives"... involve educational materials & qualified personel, requiring time & economic resources management... This is demonstrated further in the lower turnout where visible lack of gravitation & usefullness to ‘a cause’ or candidate is a hinderance...
AND...When the presidency is not at stake turnout is down...
Post 1960's Civil Right Act longterm studies of age & race demographics by the FEC & CENSUS... interpreted for minoritiess voters by registration & turnout... demonstrate disparity over time for party, age, race & race of the incumbant president... large congressional omnibus action... WAR... national civil rights & immigration acts...
Why focus away from the methodology of voter turnout on open ended elections chain of custody verification, without realizing how parties act to squeeze the vote... without answering how their party stabs people in the back... southern Black history in the democrat party... versus the contentious immigration & emmigration pattern of Chicanos or Latinos into both parties and the country... not the same at all and most visably marred in periods of various wars and economic decline... to Latinos credit they have not become ‘domesticated' party loyalists, but... pragmatic strategists and realistic about the value and outcome of ticket spliting...
