21/01/2024
๐ช๐ผ๐ผ๐น๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฎ๐๐ต๐น๐ฒ๐๐: ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐น๐น ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐?
As of 16 January 2024 select Woolworths Cafes have gone cashless. Meaning that only card payments will be accepted [Debit or Credit]. This led to an outcry on social media by some as they believed that Woolworths in its entirety would be impacted. According to the Daily Investor, โWoolworths has clarified that some of its WCafes stores are experimenting with cashless payments.โ
The signboard at select stores stated that, โWe have joined a global responsible business initiative that prioritises customer and staff safety.โ It should also be noted that the S.A. Reserve Bank has stated that Woolworths has the right to go cashless.
So let us dissect this topic, now that we have had a look at the facts. Woolworths have stated that this is a global initiative relating to customer and staff safety. Although I do commend them on their efforts to keep people safe. It just raises a bit of an eyebrow, as to why this initiative was never a great enough concern be locally addressed in the first place.
The article also went on to state that, โThe retailer said the decision for its WCafes to go cashless was based on data it had collected, showing that they received relatively few cash payments.โ Now there could be an argument that they chose a segment of their business that receives fewer cash payments from consumers in order to manage potential disruptions, but would risk be a more reasonable calculating factor? How did they calculate risk when they selected these specific Cafe stores? Risk impacts safety.
Now lets look at a possible argument behind this โglobal initiativeโ and what does cashless mean for South African consumers:
To drive loyalty we find that many banks have offered attractive reward programmes for the use of their credit and debit cards. Some institutes even offer cash-back rewards which can be seen as more useful than points which may only be redeemed through a predefined network of vendors. During a previous post, I mentioned that ๐ฐ๐ณ% of South Africans were reported to be relying on social transfers. So how does the use of card payment affect social grant recipients and those that choose to use cash as primary payment?
Well if you look at the merchant charges for the use of their facilities the average cost is around 3% for every swipe, which the Retailer/ Wholesaler must be responsible for. This 3% is then built into the cost of goods and services, and since a large chunk of South African citizens transact with cash they basically are funding the rewards for card holders with loyalty programmes. Everyone pays 3% more for their goods/ services but only the card holder on the loyalty programme will receive a reward.
Social grant recipients are more likely to spend the limited amount of money they have on commodities and live from month to month with limited or no access to credit facilities. If they receive a grant of R1000 then they will most likely spend R1000 during the month. When the government made the additional COVID grant of R350 per month available, it was one of the quickest ways to stimulate the economy through the sale of fast-moving consumer goods. A large chunk of these FMCG goods were commodity items.
There are a few things we should think about, when considering the greater impact:
1. Is this just a global effort to regulate and track consumers?
2. Has the centralised banking system become increasingly concerned with decentralised methods of payments (The rise of Cryptocurrency)?
3. The global economy are facing major challenges, especially with ongoing political conflicts. Is this their initiative to gain authority and take control of the global economy?
So far we see UNIQ by Checkers that have launched cashless stores, with Starbucks deciding to go cashless towards the end of 2023 in South Africa. It may seem of very little significance in South Africa at this point, but we must consider the implications for the future.