Dr.POUL wayne » professional expect.

Dr.POUL wayne » professional expect. Maintenance technician. From electronics (cellphones, computers, CD'js , amplifiers, surveillance ca

17/08/2021

Here's a breakdown on your government's R500 billion loan from the reserve bank.

1st, there's no report revealing how much money was spent, and how much is left.
2nd, the government of South Africa is manipulating people, I mean how can you compensate almost 40-50million people from R500 Billion? Statistically there are around 60-70 million people in South Africa, 10-20 million working and only 30-40 millions South Africans qualified for those bribing R350, and it's a bribe because they're giving it to the needy, the poor ones, the hungry ones, the desperate ones whole just keep quiet with few cents on their pockets. The government initially took a loan of R500 billion from the world's reserve bank and claimed it was for the impact of covid-19 in South Africa, that was just a lie, now there's no traces of that R500 billion. If the government wanted to compensate the hungry and the poor, they could've used only, just only R1 billion from that R500 billion then from that R1 billion they could've only used -R100 million and compensate the poor with a R1 000 000 each and that's roughly 40-50 million people paid and sorted for life, how long will the poor be poor while the rich get richer? How long will the rich take from the poor? will the poor ever gonna taste success? Now people looted a few malls and the richer panicked and got upset, as for the government they got furious because after all, they have and own shares from those malls, why would the government use the people's money to repair insured infrastructure? It's another way of milking money and bribe the people! South African youth needs to stand up, in few years to come South Africa might go bankrupt and that's a known fact, the people of South Africa needs answers though they don't know the questions yet!

17/08/2021

Here's a breakdown on the covid-19 vaccine.

Three COVID-19 vaccines have been granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since mid-December 2020. Prior to authorization by the FDA, these vaccines underwent the same rigorous safety and effectiveness standards as all other vaccines. Quickly, vaccine distribution began, starting with health care professionals on the frontlines of patient care.

Once available to the broader public, it’s critical that a high percentage of the population receive the vaccine in order to achieve herd immunity against COVID-19. Herd immunity occurs when most of a population is immune to an infectious disease (either from previous infection and/or vaccination) and provides indirect protection to those who are not immune to the disease.

There have been many rumors flying around on the internet about what’s in the vaccine. Some rumors even suggested that the vaccines contain gluten, wheat, eggs and even bee venom! All of that is simply, untrue.

If you’re among the many wondering “what’s actually in it?” and, “is it safe to receive the injection?”, keep reading.

COVID Vaccine Ingredients

There are two COVID-19 messenger-ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines currently authorized for emergent use in the United States: the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna vaccines. A third vaccine developed by Johnson &Johnson (J&J) Janssen uses a viral vector platform. Conventional vaccines, rely on weakened and inactivated pathogens or a fragment of the pathogen to trigger an immune response. In contrast, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines use a new approach by which mRNA is delivered into our cells to provide the genetic instructions for our own cells to “temporarily” make a “specific” viral protein (the coronavirus spike protein) that triggers an immune response. The J&J COVID-19 vaccine is a type of “replication-incompetent vector vaccine.” This vaccine also contains the genetic instructions to express a stabilized covid

SIU (Special Investigation Unit) 2020 Report.Status of Investigation20-OCI-001Custody InjuryHamilton Police ServiceJan 1...
05/09/2020

SIU (Special Investigation Unit) 2020 Report.

Status of Investigation20-OCI-001Custody InjuryHamilton Police ServiceJan 1, 2020

Investigation concluded with no charges issued

; Director's Report available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/directors_report_details.php?drid=87520-OOD-002Other DeathWindsor Police ServiceJan 4, 2020

Investigation terminated

; News release available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/news_template.php?nrid=548620-OCI-003Custody InjuryCornwall Community Police ServiceJan 7, 2020

Investigation concluded with no charges issued

; Director's Report available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/directors_report_details.php?drid=82020-PCI-004Custody InjuryOPP South Bruce DetachmentJan 7, 2020

Investigation concluded with no charges issued

; Director's Report available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/directors_report_details.php?drid=74520-OFD-005Firearm DeathPeel Regional PoliceJan 7, 2020

Investigation ongoing; file under Director’s review

20-PSA-006Sexual Assault AllegationOPP Huronia West DetachmentJan 8, 2020

Jun 1, 2020 -- Investigation concluded with no charges issued. The SIU does not post any reports dealing with investigations of a sexual nature.

20-OCI-007Custody InjuryTimmins Police ServiceJan 10, 2020

Investigation terminated

; News release available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/news_template.php?nrid=566220-TFD-008Firearm DeathToronto Police ServiceJan 18, 2020

Investigation ongoing; file under Director’s review

20-PCI-009Custody InjuryOPP Orillia DetachmentJan 18, 2020

Investigation terminated

; News release available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/news_template.php?nrid=550420-OCI-010Custody InjuryNiagara Regional Police ServiceJan 19, 2020

Investigation concluded with no charges issued

; Director's Report available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/directors_report_details.php?drid=90020-OVI-011Vehicle InjuryPeterborough Police ServiceJan 22, 2020

Investigation concluded with no charges issued

; Director's Report available
https://www.siu.on.ca/en/directors_rep

This is the [...] page of the SIU website.

05/09/2020

The Special Investigations Unit (SIU) says it has reprioritised some of its cases to ensure it investigates at least 658 contracts related to Covid-19 procurement worth R5 billion.
However, SIU head Andy Mothibi assured the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) on Wednesday that their investigations into state-owned enterprises, notably Eskom, would not be affected.
Last month, as allegations of graft around the procurement of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) emerged, President Cyril Ramaphosa signed a proclamation mandating the SIU to investigate irregularities in Covid-19-related contracts across government departments and all other spheres of state.
In total, the SIU is investigating 658 contracts, worth just over R5 billion, even though this figure could rise substantially, as some of the contracts are still to be quantified.
According to the information presented to Scopa, the government department with the most contracts under investigation is the Eastern Cape Department of Health, with 239 cases worth R622.4 million.
In terms of national departments, the SIU is investigating a single contract in the Department of Labour, Department of Education, Department of Defence and Department of Public Works and Infrastructure, and 22 cases worth R53.9 million at the Department of Correctional Services.
Fence sitting
Mothibi confirmed that the case at the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure was that of the Beitbridge border fence.
He said it was one of the first Covid-19-related investigations it had become involved in and that they had already made several findings and found some irregularities.
Mothibi said they wanted to probe the Covid-19 cases speedily, without compromising the investigations.
"The teams are resourced," he said, referring to the SIU's provincial teams, adding that they had reallocated resources "to prioritise this one".
"The teams are really hard at work."
After a question from DA MP Benedicta van Minnen, on whether the realloc

05/09/2020

The World Health Organization (WHO) has said the Covid-19 outbreak in Africa may have passed its peak, but warns governments not to be complacent as countries relax their restrictions.

The number of new daily confirmed cases overall has been dropping, although some countries are still seeing a rise in cases.

At what rate is coronavirus spreading?

Over the past four weeks, there has been an average 14% fall in the number of weekly new cases being reported.

"We have had what seems to have been a peak and now have the daily number of cases being reported overall at the regional level going down," says WHO's Africa region head Matshidiso Moeti.

That may be because the rate of increase has slowed in the more populous countries like South Africa, Egypt and Nigeria.

But there've been increases in cases in other countries, according to the Africa Centres for Disease Control (CDC).

IMAGE COPYRIGHTREUTERS

image captionAfrica accounts for five per cent of all global cases and three per cent of deaths

Uganda and Rwanda have also experienced an increase in cases recently. In North Africa, Morocco and Tunisia are experiencing a sustained increase in cases, and there's been a rapid increase in cases in Libya, according to the WHO.

However, both Algeria and Egypt have seen a decline in confirmed cases over the past month. Ghana, Gabon, Madagascar and Zambia have also seen a drop in the numbers of new cases.



The global humanitarian relief body, the International Rescue Committee, says it believes the true scale of the pandemic may be hidden because of a lack of testing and issues with data.

And the WHO says their figures should be treated with caution as they may be affected by changes in testing capacity and strategy, and delays in reporting data.

One example is Kenya where reported case numbers have been dropping for three weeks now. The WHO points out the country has changed its testing strategy to focus on higher-risk groups only.



Others like Ethiopia have b

24/03/2020

SASSA announces measures to combat Covid-19 Coronavirus

19 Mar 2020

SASSA Statement in Response to Coronavirus Outbreak

President Ramaphosa declared a national state of disaster in terms of the Disaster Management Act when made an announcement on the 15th of March 2020.

Following the above declaration, the government has prohibited large gatherings of no more than 100 people, and as SASSA we work with people and communities, our offices are often jam-packed on a daily basis because of the services we provide to the country at large.

The President’s call to action has made us take our own precautionary measures. This situation calls for urgent action to be taken looking at our daily and monthly business as SASSA and SAPO. Beneficiaries are requested to avoid collecting their grants on the first day of payment due to the high pedestrian traffic at shopping malls and other outlets.

The following measures have been put in place with immediate effect in all SASSA offices to ensure the safety of our clients and staff and, most importantly, that no services are interrupted:

Drawing money on first payment day

Beneficiaries are advised to avoid collecting their grants on the first day of payment due to the high pedestrian traffic at shopping malls and other outlets, which is a health risk during this period. Once SASSA has paid money into a beneficiary’s account the money will stay there and can be accessed at any day of the month instead of taking a health risk of visiting an outlet on the first day of the month.

ICROP - Integrated Community Registration Outreach Programmes

All ICROP programmes are suspended with immediate effect as most of our outreach programme is attended by more than 100 people (including children and the elderly).

Home Visits

Home, clinic and hospital visits by SASSA officials are suspended with immediate effect. Where a client is above 75 years of age and is bedridden and unable to report to a SASSA office, an application process can be co

24/03/2020

2020 coronavirus pandemic in South Africa
This article documents a current pandemic . Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be
unreliable . The latest updates to this article
may not reflect the most current information. Please feel free to improve this article (but note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed) or discuss changes on the talk page. (March 2020) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message )
The 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic spread to South Africa , with the first case confirmed on 5 March 2020 .[2] As of 24 March 2020, there were a total of 554 confirmed cases and 0 deaths.[1]
On 15 March, President Cyril Ramaphosa declared a national state of disaster lasting for three months if not extended or cancelled, with a partial travel ban, travel advisories, discouraging public transport, the closing of schools, and prohibiting gatherings of more than 100 people.[3]
There is a list of hospitals that have been assigned to deal with testing. Anyone who goes to a state hospital will have their test for free.[4]
On 23 March 2020, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced a state of national
lockdown lasting 21 days from 26 March 2020 to 16 April 2020.
Preparations
After the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared COVID-19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020, an emergency operation centre was activated.
Cases
March
COVID-19 cases in South Africa (
v t e
)
Deaths Recoveries Active case
Date # of cases
2020-03-05 1
2020-03-06 1
2020-03-07 2 (+100%
2020-03-08 3 (+50%)
2020-03-09 7 (+133%
2020-03-10 7
2020-03-11 13 (+86%)
2020-03-12 16 (+23%)
2020-03-13 24 (+50%)
2020-03-14 38 (+58%)
2020-03-15 [a]51 (+34%)
2020-03-16 62 (+22%)
2020-03-17 85 (+37%)
2020-03-18 116 (+36%)
2020-03-19 150 (+29%)
2020-03-20 202 (+35%)
2020-03-21 240 (+19%)
2020-03-22 274 (+14%)
2020-03-23 402 (+47%)
2020-03-24 554 (+38%)
Sources: 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Sou Africa
On 1

14/07/2019

Last week was horrifying for big SA businesses and their bosses — here’s how the losses are piling up
Helena Wasserman , Business Insider SA
May 27

The share prices of a number of large companies went into freefall last week.
Some top CEOs also lost their jobs in a wild week for some of SA's largest businesses.
So far, 2019 has been disastrous for investors in most of South Africa’s largest listed companies.
Netcare and Sappi have declined by more than 30%.
For more, go to Business Insider SA.
One of the wildest weeks in recent memory has wreaked havoc on investment portfolios and claimed the scalps of some of South Africa’s top CEOs.

Here were some of the biggest shockers from last week:

Old Mutual’s CEO was suspended amid a fight over his side business

Peter Moyo
In the 15 minutes following the announcement that Peter Moyo was suspended, almost R5 billion was wiped off Old Mutual’s value on Friday morning. The share price later recovered, but still ended down more than 2% after a weak trading update.

It seems that Moyo's interest in an investment company called NMT was the sticking point. Old Mutual invested almost R300 million in NMT. The Old Mutual board and Moyo "disagreed materially on how the conflict of interest has been managed, resulting in a breakdown in the required mutual trust and confidence”.

Eskom’s CEO resigned unexpectedly

Eskom CEO Phakamani Hadebe during the state entity's interim results announcement at Megawatt Park, Johannesburg, in January (Gallo mages / Felix Dlangamandla)
Phakamani Hadebe said the job was taking a toll on his health.

According to Rapport newspaper, Hadebe is believed to have collapsed at work on two separate occasions and had to be taken to hospital by ambulance. A reliable source within Eskom claimed that Hadebe twice attempted to hand in his resignation, but was persuaded to stay.

Sasol went into freefall

Its share dropped 17% after it (again) raised the expected cost of its American Lake Charles Chemicals Project. The project will now cost $12.9 billion – 45% more than its original projections.

“That is not even the worst part,” says JC Louw, CEO of the investment information and trading platform Sharenet. Sasol also cut its forecast return to a range on the project of 6.0% - 6.5%, yet the company's weighted average cost of capital is 8.0%.” I am no expert in managing a beast like Sasol, but if a project is costing you 8% per year to fund and it only returns 6%, isn't that a recipe for loss?”

Netcare’s CEO had to dump R200 million in shares

Richard Friedland sold almost all of his own shares in the company.

The company says he was "obliged" to sell the shares to settle finance and other costs. It is common for executives to put up their shares as security in exchange for bank loans - and when Netcare's share price started falling, he had to sell to cover the loans. Netcare's share price has halved over the past four years.

“A SENS announcement emphasised that Friedland remains committed to the success of the company and will stay on as CEO, but we can't help but notice that he is now R200 million less committed,” says Louw.

Comair’s CEO unexpectedly resigned

Erik Venter
Erik Venter, who has been with the company for 23 years, resigned “to pursue his own interests”.

Grand Parade’s chair quit

Hassen Adams, chair of Grand Parade Investments. Photo: Lerato Maduna
The executive chair and founder of Grand Parade Investments resigned from his executive position. Hassen Adams sold R60 million in shares before resigning. Small shareholders have been trying for months to get Adams out.

Massmart lost a fifth of its value

The owner of Makro, Game and Builders Warehouse tanked after warning that its earnings for the current six months will be at least 50% lower than last year. Sales growth at all of its retail stores are sluggish, and were below 4% for the first twenty weeks of its new financial year.

Its CEO recently resigned, and will now be replaced by a Walmart fixer, 52-year old Mitch Slape, who has been with the US giant for almost a quarter of a century. Walmart owns a majority stake in Massmart.

Tiger Brands slumped 11%

The food producer started bleeding after releasing its results, which showed a 2% decline in its revenue. Its earnings fell 12% due to lower exports and the continued costs of a deadly outbreak of listeriosis, which has resulted in a class action suit filed by victims.

So far 2019 has been disastrous for investors in most of South Africa’s largest listed companies.

TimBukOne, a financial software company for the investment market, has compiled a list of the worst-performing shares since the start of the year:

Sappi -32%

Its share price has almost halved from its peak over the past year. The company is under pressure amid weak demand for its products in Europe and increased spending on new factories.

Netcare -30%

The share took a beating after its latest results showed that hospital occupancy and profitability are on the decrease.

Aspen -26%

The pharmaceutical company is down two-thirds from its highest point over the past year, as investors worry about its debt burden, which has reached R53.5 billion and is larger than its market value.

Mr Price -23%, Woolworths -19% and Shoprite -14%

The tough retail climate has triggered a sharp sell-off in most retailers.

Tiger Brands -20%

The share is now almost 40% below its highest point over the past year.

Sasol -17%

Sasol is also almost 40% below its peak over the past year.

Vodacom -13%

The share was sold off after its revenue came under pressure. By comparison, its competitor MTN is up 12.5% so far this year.

Some of the only winners were in the resource sector, including Angloplat (22%) and Gold Fields (+13%).

14/07/2019

Five reasons why South Africa has lost 83 000 businesses since 2007
A myriad of factors are responsible for tens of thousands of South African businesses going bust in the last decade: Here's what has caused the exodus.

The greatest struggle in South Africa is the arduous task of reigniting the jobs market. Youth unemployment is the highest in the world here and millions of citizens are effectively excluded from the realm of work. So the latest findings from the Enterprise Observatory of South Africa (EOSA) don’t make for a light read.

The researchers have concluded that, for a 10-year period between 2007 – 2017, the number of companies registered in South Africa took a nosedive. From having 222 532 tax-paying businesses in 2007, that latest figure now stands at 139 664 – a massive decline of almost 83 000 places of employment, equating to 37% of the market.

The data-set mainly focuses on the wide-ranging financial and business sectors. That would include institutions like banks, money lenders, short term insurance firms and independent brokers, investment advisors, business consulting firms as well as real estate services.

But what exactly has gone so drastically wrong, in such a short space of time? EOSA were on hand to explain.

Why South Africa is shedding businesses:
The global financial crisis

When the credit crunch of 2007-2008 hit, everywhere on Earth was affected. The extent of the reckless banking attitudes had a terrible impact on South Africa, and is seen as the “ground zero” of this business exodus. There was a jaw-dropping 79.6% decrease in the taxable turnover from 2008 to 2010.

More business red tape

Ensuring compliance from these organisations has gone from being a well-intentioned plan to regulate business, to becoming an unmanageable burden for small companies. The number of man-hours and downtime this paperwork is responsible for has been lamented for driving some outfits out of business.

Property prices in South Africa

The real estate market has experienced some severe ups and downs over the past 10 years and this rollercoaster ride is too much for smaller businesses to handle. The “static” prices have only allowed bigger companies to thrive, kicking less-established estate agents to the kerb.

The cost of crime

South Africa has the fifth-highest cost of crime in the world. Whether it’s petty vandalism or full-scale robberies, picking up the pieces of a criminal operation can often be the death-knell for a business.

Mass emigration from South Africa

Around 400 000 skilled professionals have left South Africa since 1994. They are taking their money with them, of course, but we’re now seeing a new trend where the wealthy who stay behind in Mzansi also send their savings abroad. This “financial emigration” means that there is less and less work for domestic experts.

14/07/2019

Capital concerns for SA

Only Luxembourg and The Netherlands use a bigger chunk of their GDP to make foreign investments than South Africa. The gulf – estimated to be about R1.7 trillion – is apparently responsible for a catastrophic inability to create more jobs in this country:

“Using the average emerging market as a measure (average is taken as 12% of GDP as calculated), SA should have had R2.2 trillion in extra fixed investments by the end of 2017.”

“Assuming that the capital and labour ratio stays the same, this would have meant about 3.1 million more jobs. The net foreign investment stock is hard data collected by Unctad as well as the South African Reserve Bank. Other international bodies show similar declines and comparable trends.”

Mike Schussler, Chief Economist for economists.co.za
Investment in South Africa

It’s a report full of twists, turns and shocks – but ultimately, we continue to arrive at the same conclusion: Money is leaving South Africa at a much faster rate than it is coming in.

This is measured as “Foreign Direct Investment” (FDI), and as it stands, Zimbabwe currently has a better net percentage than SA. The problem has been exacerbated by some of the biggest homegrown companies deciding to set up shop abroad.

The likes of Investec, Anglo American and Steinhoff are huge South African-built businesses that now mainly operate from abroad. If they had stayed within these borders, our FDI ratio would be a lot easier on the eye as it would bring more money into the country and generate a bounty of employment.

With the cumulative data stretching back to 2017, Cyril Ramaphosa’s recent foreign investment drive could end up providing some relief here. But nonetheless, it does nothing to curb the amount of money leaving South Africa – and that’s the crux of the matter.

The economy of South Africa is the second largest in Africa , after Nigeria . [15] As a regional manufacturing hub, it i...
14/07/2019

The economy of South Africa is the second largest in Africa , after Nigeria . [15] As a regional manufacturing hub, it is the most industrialized and diversified economy on the continent. [16]
South Africa is an upper-middle-income economy by the World Bank – one of only four such countries in Africa (alongside Botswana ,
Gabon and Mauritius ). [17] Since 1996, at the end of over twelve years of international sanctions, South Africa's Gross Domestic Product almost tripled to peak at $400 billion in 2011, but has since declined to roughly $385 billion in 2019. In the same period, foreign exchange reserves increased from $3 billion to nearly $50 billion creating a diversified economy with a growing and sizable middle class, within two decades of ending apartheid . [18][19]
:chapter 1 South African state owned enterprises play a significant role in the country's economy with the government owning a share in around 700 SOEs involved in a wide array of important industries. In 2016 the top five challenges to doing business in the country were inefficient government bureaucracy, restrictive labour regulations, a shortage of skilled workers, political instability, and corruption, whilst the country's strong banking sector was rated as a strongly positive feature of the economy. [20][21] The nation is among the G20 , and is the only African member of the group. [22]
History
Main article: Economic history of South Africa
The formal economy of South Africa has its beginnings in the arrival of Dutch settlers in 1652, originally sent by the Dutch East India Company to establish a provisioning station for passing ships. As the colony increased in size, with the arrival of French Huguenots and German citizens, some of the colonists were set free to pursue commercial farming, leading to the dominance of agriculture in the economy.
At the end of the 18th century, the British annexed the colony. This led to the Great Trek , spreading farming deeper into the mainland, as well as the establishment of the independent
Boer Republics of Transvaal and the Orange Free State .
In 1870 diamonds were discovered in Kimberley, while in 1886 some of the world's largest gold deposits were discovered in the Witwatersrand region of Transvaal, quickly transforming the economy into a resource-dominated one. The British annexed the area as a result of the Boer War which witnessed the placement of Boer women and children in British-built
concentration camps. The country also entered a period of industrialization during this time, including the organization of the first South African trade unions .
The country soon started putting laws distinguishing between different races in place. In 1948 the National Party won the national elections, and immediately started implementing an even stricter race-based policy named
Apartheid , effectively dividing the economy into a privileged white one, and an impoverished black one. The policy was widely criticised and led to crippling sanctions being placed against the country in the 1980s.
South Africa held its first multi-racial elections in 1994, leaving the newly elected African National Congress (ANC) government the daunting task of trying to restore order to an economy harmed by sanctions, while also integrating the previously disadvantaged segment of the population into it. The 1994 government inherited an economy wracked by long years of internal conflict and external sanctions.
The government refrained from resorting to economic populism. Inflation was brought down, public finances were stabilised, and some foreign capital was attracted. [23] However, growth was still subpar. [23] At the start of 2000, then President Thabo Mbeki vowed to promote economic growth and foreign investment by relaxing restrictive labour laws, stepping up the pace of privatisation, raising governmental spending [24] and cutting interest rates sharply from 1998 levels. [25][26] His policies faced strong opposition from organised labour . From 2004 onward economic growth picked up significantly; both employment and capital formation increased. [23]
In April 2009, amid fears that South Africa would soon join much of the rest of the world in the
late-2000s recession, Reserve Bank Governor
Tito Mboweni and Minister of Finance Trevor Manuel differed on the matter: whereas Manuel foresaw a quarter of economic growth, Mboweni predicted further decline: "technically," he said, "that's a recession." [27] In 2009 the Nobel-Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz warned South Africa that inflation targeting should be a secondary concern amid the global financial crisis of 2007–2009. [28]
South Africa, unlike other emerging markets, has struggled through the late 2000s recession, and the recovery has been largely led by private and public consumption growth, while export volumes and private investment have yet to fully recover. [29] The long-term potential growth rate of South Africa under the current policy environment has been estimated at 3.5%. [30] Per capita GDP growth has proved mediocre, though improving, growing by 1.6% a year from 1994 to 2009, and by 2.2% over the 2000–09 decade, [31] compared to world growth of 3.1% over the same period.
The high levels of unemployment, at over 25%, and inequality are considered by the government and most South Africans to be the most salient economic problems facing the country. [32] These issues, and others linked to them such as crime, have in turn hurt investment and growth, consequently having a negative feedback effect on employment. [32] Crime is considered a major or very severe constraint on investment by 30% of enterprises in South Africa, putting crime among the four most frequently mentioned constraints. [33]
In April 2017, political tensions in the country arose over the sacking of nine cabinet members including Minister of Finance Pravin Gordhan by the president Jacob Zuma . [34] The finance minister was seen as central to efforts to restore confidence in South Africa. As a result of the tensions, S&P Global cut South Africa's credit rating to junk status on Monday 3 April 2017. [35] Fitch Ratings followed suit on Friday 7 April 2017 and cut the country's credit status to the sub-investment grade of BBB-. [36] The South African rand lost more than 11% in the week following the cabinet reshuffling. [35]
Historical statistics 1980-2017
The following table shows the main economic indicators in 1980–2017. Inflation under 5% is in green. [37]
Year GDP
(in Bil. US$ PPP) GDP per capita
(in US$PPP) GDP growth
(real) Inflation rate
(in Percent) Unemplo
(in Per
1980 134.7 4,631 6.6 % 14.2 % 9.2
1981 155.1 5,200 5.4 % 15.3 % 9.8
1982 164.1 5,362 −0.4 % 14.4 % 10.8
1983 167.5 5,331 −1.8 % 12.5 % 12.5
1984 182.2 5,658 5.1 % 11.3 % 13,7
1985 185.8 5,634 −1.2 % 16.4 % 15.5
1986 189.6 5,620 0.0 % 18.4 % 16.0
1987 198.5 5,760 2.1 % 16.2 % 16.6
1988 214.1 6,081 4.2 % 12.9 % 17.2
1989 227.7 6,331 2.4 % 14.8 % 17.8
1990 235.4 6,398 −0.3 % 14.2 % 18.8
1991 240.8 6,388 −1.0 % 15.2 % 20.2
1992 241.0 6,234 −2.1 % 14.1 % 21.2
1993 249.8 6,306 1.3 % 9.7 % 22.2
1994 263.3 6,492 3.2 % 8.8 % 22.9
1995 277.2 6,690 3.1 % 8.8 % 16.5
1996 294.3 6,973 4.3 % 7.4 % 20.3
1997 307.2 7,157 2.6 % 8.6 % 22.0
1998 312.1 7,161 0.5 % 7.0 % 26.1
1999 324.4 7,335 2.4 % 5.1 % 23.3
2000 345.8 7,701 4.2 % 5.4 % 23.0
2001 363.2 7,968 2.7 % 5.6 % 26.0
2002 382.4 8,327 3.7 % 9.1 % 27.8
2003 401.5 8,642 2.9 % 5.9 % 27.7
2004 431.4 9,174 4.6 % 1.4 % 25.2
2005 468.7 9,847 5.3 % 3.4 % 24.7
2006 510.2 10,584 5.6 % 4.6 % 23.6
2007 551.9 11,302 5.4 % 5.4 % 23.0
2008 580.7 11,735 3,2 % 11.0 % 22.5
2009 576.1 11,486 −1.5 % 7.1 % 23.6
2010 600.8 11,816 3.0 % 4.3 % 24.9
2011 633.4 12,281 3.3 % 5.0 % 24.8
2012 659.3 12,600 2.3 % 5.6 % 24.9
2013 686.6 12,930 2.5 % 5.8 % 24.7
2014 711.8 13,204 1.8 % 6.1 % 25.1
2015 728.8 13,311 1.3 % 4.6 % 25.4
2016 742.2 13,345 0.6 % 6.3 % 26.7
2017 765.6 13,544 1.3 % 5.3 % 27.5
This is a chart of the trend of South Africa's gross domestic product (GDP) at market prices estimated by the International Monetary Fund: [38]
Year GDP, US$ bln US dollar exchange in early January Unemployment rate Pe capi inco in U
1980 80.547 0.8267 Rand[39] 9.2 2764
1985 57.273 2.0052 Rand[39] 15.5 1736
1990 111.998 2.5419 Rand[39] 16.0 3039
1995 151.117 3.5486 Rand[39] 16.7 3684
2000 132.964 6.1188 Rand[39] 25.6 2986
2005 246.956 5.6497 Rand[39] 26.7 5267
2010 363.655 7.462 Rand[40] 24.9 7274
2015 510.937 15.52 Rand[41] 22.8 5744
Sectors
South Africa Export Treemap by Product (2014) from Harvard Atlas of Economic Complexity
South Africa has a comparative advantage in the production of agriculture , mining and
manufacturing products relating to these sectors. [43] South Africa has shifted from a
primary and secondary economy in the mid-twentieth century to an economy driven primarily by the tertiary sector in the present day which accounts for an estimated 65% of GDP or $230 billion in nominal GDP terms. The country's economy is reasonably diversified with key economic sectors including mining, agriculture and fisheries, vehicle manufacturing and assembly, food processing, clothing and textiles, telecommunication, energy, financial and business services, real estate, tourism, transportation, and wholesale and retail trade. [44]
Seasonally adjusted and annualised quarterly value added (Q1 2013) [45]
Industry Value added
(R billion, 2004 prices)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 43.382
Mining and quarrying 97.096
Manufacturing 296.586
Electricity, gas and water 33.951
Construction 59.943
Wholesale and retail trade, hotels and restaurants 246.584
Transport, storage and communication 178.591
Finance, real estate and business services 422.850
General government services 271.209
Personal services 107.690
Taxes less subsidies on products 215.668
GDP at market prices 1,973.552
Natural resources
See also: Mining industry of South Africa
Mining has been the main driving force behind the history and development of Africa's most advanced economy. Large-scale and profitable mining started with the discovery of a diamond on the banks of the Orange River in 1867 by Erasmus Jacobs and the subsequent discovery and exploitation of the Kimberley pipes a few years later. Gold rushes to Pilgrim's Rest and
Barberton were precursors to the biggest discovery of all, the Main Reef/Main Reef Leader on Gerhardus Oosthuizen's farm Langlaagte, Portion C, in 1886, the Witwatersrand Gold Rush and the subsequent rapid development of the gold field there, the biggest of them all.
South Africa is one of the world's leading mining and mineral-processing countries. [46] Though mining's contribution to the national GDP has fallen from 21% in 1970 to 6% in 2011, it still represents almost 60% of exports. [47] The mining sector accounts for up to 9% of value added. [48]
In 2008, South Africa's estimated share of world platinum production amounted to 77%; kyanite and other materials, 55%; chromium, 45%;
palladium , 39%; vermiculite , 39%; vanadium, 38%; zirconium , 30%; manganese , 21%; rutile , 20%; ilmenite, 19%; gold, 11%; fluorspar , 6%; aluminium, 2%; antimony, 2%; iron ore, 2%; nickel, 2%; and phosphate rock , 1%. [46] South Africa also accounted for nearly 5% of the world's polished diamond production by value. [46] The country's estimated share of world reserves of platinum group metals amounted to 89%; hafnium, 46%; zirconium , 27%; vanadium, 23%; manganese , 19%; rutile , 18%; fluorspar , 18%; gold, 13%; phosphate rock , 10%; ilmenite, 9%; and nickel, 5%. [46] It is also the world's third largest coal exporter. [49]
The mining sector has a mix of privately owned and state-controlled mines, the latter including
African Exploration Mining and Finance Corporation . [50]
Agriculture and food processing
Main article: Agriculture in South Africa
Workers planting on a farm in the central area of Mpumalanga
Farm workers
The agricultural industry contributes around 5% of formal employment, relatively low compared to other parts of Africa, as well as providing work for casual labourers and contributing around 2.8% of GDP for the nation. [3][51] However, due to the aridity of the land, only 13.5% can be used for crop production, and only 3% is considered high potential land. [52] The sector continues to face problems, with increased foreign competition and crime being two of the major challenges for the industry. The government has been accused of either putting in too much effort, [53] or not enough effort, [54] to tackle the problem of farm attacks as opposed to other forms of violent crime.
Maize production, which contributes to a 36% majority of the gross value of South Africa's field crops, has also experienced negative effects due to climate change. [55] The estimated value of loss, which takes into consideration scenarios with and without the carbon dioxide fertilisation effect, [56] ranges between tens and hundreds of millions of Rands. [57]
According to FAOSTAT , South Africa is one of world's largest producers of: chicory roots (4th);
grapefruit (4th); cereals (5th); green maize and maize (7th); castor oil seed (9th); pears (9th);
sisal (10th); fibre crops (10th). [58] In the first quarter of 2010, the agricultural sector earned export revenues for R10.1 billion and used R8.4 billion to pay for imported agricultural products, therefore earning a positive trade balance of R1.7 billion. [59]
The most important agricultural exports of South Africa include: edible fruit and nuts, beverages, preserved food, to***co, cereals , wool not carded or combed, miscellaneous food, sugar, meat, milling products, malt and starch. [59] These products accounted for over 80% of agricultural export revenue in the first quarter of 2010. [59] The most important agricultural imports, which accounted for over 60% of agricultural import value during the same period, include: cereals, meat, soya-bean oil cake, beverages, soya-bean oil and its fractions, to***co, palm oil and its fractions, miscellaneous food, spices, coffee, tea, and preserved food. [59]
The dairy industry consists of around 4,300 milk producers providing employment for 60,000 farm workers and contributing to the livelihoods of around 40,000 others. [60]
The food sub-sector is the largest employer within the agro-processing sector – contributing 1.4% to total employment, and 11.5% within the manufacturing sector. [61] In 2006, the agro-processing sector represented 24.7% of the total manufacturing output. [61] Although the economy as a whole gained 975,941 jobs between 1995 and 2006, the agro-processing sector lost 45,977 jobs. [61] The competitive pressures from abroad, particularly from China and India, played a role in the decline of exports for the food, textiles and paper sub-sectors, as firms in these sectors increasingly compete with lower cost producers. [61] Increased exports from the beverages, to***co, wood and leather sub-sectors over the period are probably due to the presence of large dominant firms within these sectors in South Africa, that have managed to remain competitive. [61]
Manufacturing
The manufacturing industry's contribution to the
economy is relatively small, providing just 13.3% of jobs and 15% of GDP. Labour costs are low, but not nearly as low as in most other emerging markets, and the cost of the transport, communications and general living is much higher. [62]
The South African automotive industry accounts for about 10% of South Africa's manufacturing exports, contributes 7.5% to the country's GDP and employs around 36,000 people. Annual production in 2007 was 535,000 vehicles, out of a global production of 73 million units in the same year. Vehicle exports were in the region of 170,000 units in 2007, exported mainly to Japan (about 29% of the value of total exports), Australia (20%), the UK (12%) and the US (11%). South Africa also exported ZAR 30.3 billion worth of auto components in 2006. [63]
BMW , Ford , Volkswagen , Daimler-Chrysler ,
General Motors , Nissan and Toyota all have production plants in South Africa. Large component manufacturers with bases in the country are Arvin Exhaust, Bloxwitch, Corning and Senior Flexonics. There are also about 200 automotive component manufacturers in South Africa, and more than 150 others that supply the industry on a non-exclusive basis. The industry is concentrated in two provinces, the Eastern Cape and Gauteng. [63] Companies producing in South Africa can take advantage of the low production costs and the access to new markets as a result of trade agreements with the European Union and the Southern African Development Community . [63]
After a steep decline of 10.4% in 2009, the manufacturing sector performed well in 2010, growing by 5%, though this rebound was limited to the automotive, basic chemicals, iron and steel and food and beverages industries. [64] The performance of this sector remains curtailed by the low demand in South Africa's main export markets in the developed world. [64]
Service industry
See also: Telecommunications in South Africa and Tourism in South Africa
Canal Walk shopping centre in Cape Town
The domestic telecommunications infrastructure provides modern and efficient service to urban areas, including cellular and internet services. In 1997, Telkom , the South African telecommunications parastatal , was partly privatised and entered into a strategic equity partnership with a consortium of two companies, including SBC, a U.S. telecommunications company. In exchange for exclusivity (a monopoly) to provide certain services for 5 years, Telkom assumed an obligation to facilitate network modernisation and expansion into the unserved areas. A Second Network Operator was to be licensed to compete with Telkom across its spectrum of services in 2002, although this license was only officially handed over in late 2005 and has recently begun operating under the name,
Neotel. Five mobile-phone companies provide service to over 20 million subscribers, with South Africa considered to have the 4th most advanced mobile telecommunications network worldwide. The five major cellular providers are
Vodacom , MTN , Cell C, 8ta (owned by the parastatal, Telkom) and Virgin Mobile .
Business process outsourcing
Over the last few decades, South Africa and particularly the Cape Town region has established itself as a successful call centre and
business process outsourcing destination. With a highly talented pool of productive labour and with Cape Town sharing cultural affinity with Britain, large overseas firms such as Lufthansa, Amazon.com, ASDA, The Carphone Warehouse, Delta Airlines and many more have established inbound call centres within Cape Town as a means of utilising Cape Town's low labour costs and talented labour force.
Tourism
South Africa is a popular tourist destination, with around 860,000 arrivals per month (March 2008) of which around 210,000 is from outside the African continent. [65] In 2012 South Africa received 9.2 million international arrivals. [66] In August 2017 3.5 million travellers came to South Africa. [67] According to the World Travel & Tourism Council, travel and tourism directly contributed ZAR102 billion to South African GDP in 2012 and supports 10.3% of jobs in the country. [68] Among the main attractions are the diverse and picturesque landscape, the game reserves and the highly regarded local wines.
Financial services
Johannesburg
South Africa has a sophisticated financial structure with the JSE Securities Exchange, a large and active stock exchange that ranks 18th in the world in terms of total market capitalisation of $1.2 Trillion as of March 2018. [69]
The banking industry, overseen by the South African Reserve Bank , is dominated by four local players: Nedbank , ABSA , Standard Bank and
First Rand . [70] These banks provide both retail and investment banking services as the sector has become highly competitive with the re-entry of many experienced foreign banks, which returned to the market in the mid-1990s, having left in the late 1980s. [70] Banks operating in South Africa, when left short of liquidity, need to borrow from the SARB at a fluctuating repo rate , which in turn allows the central bank to monitor liquidity positions. [70]
Informal sector
South Africa's informal sector contributes 8% of the country's GDP and supports 27% of all working people. The South African Local Economic Development Network values the informal economy at 28% of SA's GDP. [71] Given the relevance of this input, there is a constant interest in developing actions on an inclusive urban planning for the working poor. [72]
Trade and investment
Main article: Foreign trade of South Africa
South African exports and imports between 1992 and 2011. Top graph illustrates exports (dark blue) and imports (light blue). The bottom graph illustrates South Africa's balance of trade.
Principal international trading partners of South Africa—besides other African countries—include Germany, the United States, China, Japan, the United Kingdom and Spain. [73] Chief exports include corn , diamonds, fruits, gold, metals and minerals, sugar, and wool. Machinery and transportation equipment make up more than one-third of the value of the country's imports. Other imports include chemicals, manufactured goods, and petroleum.
As a result of a November 1993 bilateral agreement, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) can assist US investors in the South African market with services such as political risk insurance and loans and loan guarantees. In July 1996, the US and South Africa signed an investment fund protocol for a $120 million OPIC fund to make equity investments in South and Southern Africa. OPIC is establishing an additional fund – the Sub-Saharan Africa Infrastructure Fund, capitalised at $350 million – to investment in infrastructure projects. The Trade and Development Agency also has been actively involved in funding feasibility studies and identifying investment opportunities in South Africa for U.S. businesses.
Despite the numerous positive economic achievements since 1994, South Africa has struggled to attract significant foreign direct investment. The situation may have started to change however, with 2005 seeing the largest single FDI into South Africa when Barclays bought a majority share in local bank Absa Group Limited . Deals between the British-based
Vodafone and South Africa's Vodacom have taken place in 2006. In 2010, two multibillion-dollar deals, one by HSBC to acquire Nedbank and one by Walmart to acquire Massmart Holdings, fell through. (Walmart did eventually buy Massmart in 2011)
Land reform and property rights
Nationalisation of mines debate
South Africa has been riven by arguments over whether the state should take over mineral resources. [74] A study commissioned by the African National Congress recommended against the policy, saying nationalisation would be an "economic disaster." [74] However, the ANC Youth Employment supporters disagree and state that it will give the government direct control over the mining sector which is also in alignment with the Freedom Charter signed in 1995. [ citation needed]
Land redistribution
The government aimed to transfer 30% of the 82 million hectares presumed to be in the hands of white farmers by Gugile Nkwinti, Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform, amounting to 24.5 million hectares, to black farmers by 2014. 6.7 million hectares had been transferred by early 2012 via redistribution and restitution. [75]
The land reform program has been criticised both by farmers' groups and by landless workers, the latter alleging that the pace of change has not been fast enough, and the former alleging anti white racist treatment with threats of genocide, voiced openly on multiple occasions by the ANC, including the former president Zuma, and expressing concerns that a similar situation to Zimbabwe's land reform policy may develop, [76] a fear exacerbated by comments made by former deputy president
Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka . [77][78]
Labour market
South Africa has an extreme and persistent high unemployment rate of over 25%, which interacts with other economic and social problems such as inadequate education, poor health outcomes and crime. [79] The poor have limited access to economic opportunities and basic services. [80] According to a 2013 Goldman Sachs report, that number increases to 35% when including people who have given up looking for work. [18] A quarter of South Africans live on less than US$1.25 a day. [81]
South Africa's mass unemployment dates back to the 1970s, and continued to rise through the 1980s and 1990s. [82] Unemployment has increased substantially since the African National Congress came to power in 1994, going from 15.6% in 1995 to 30.3% in 2001. [83] In the second quarter of 2010, the jobless rate increased to 25.3%, and the number of people with work fell by 61,000 to 12.7 million. The biggest decline in employment was recorded in the manufacturing industry, which shed 53,000 workers. Agriculture lost 32,000 jobs, employment in the construction industry fell by 15,000. In the third quarter of 2010, 29.80% of blacks were officially unemployed, compared with 22.30% of coloureds, 8.60 of Asians and 5.10% of whites.
The official unemployment rate, though very high by international standards, understates its magnitude because it includes only adults who are actively looking for work, excluding those who have given up looking for jobs. Only 41% of the population of working age have any kind of job (formal or informal). This rate is 30% points lower than that of China, and about 25% lower than that of Brazil or Indonesia. The relatively generous social grants reduces the political cost of unemployment. There is some evidence that households view paid employment and social grants as substitutes at the margin: households that lose a pension-eligible member subsequently report increased labour force participation.
The unemployment problem is characterised by its lengthy duration: in the mid-1990s nearly two thirds of the unemployed had never worked for pay. The 2005 Labour Force Survey found that 40% of unemployed individuals have been unemployed for more than three years, while 59% have never had a job at all. The unemployment rate has fuelled crime, inequality and social unrest. The global economic downturn has made the problem worse, wiping out more than a million jobs. In September 2010, over a third of South Africa's workforce were out of work, and so were more than half of blacks aged 15–34, three times the level for whites.
Some experts contend that higher wages negotiated by politically powerful trade unions have suppressed job growth. According to a study by Dani Rodrik , the shrinkage of the non-mineral tradable sector since the early 1990s and the weakness of the export-oriented manufacturing were more to blame for the low level of employment.
Knowledge
There has been a large degree of human capital flight from South Africa in recent years. South Africa's Bureau of Statistics estimates that between 1 million and 1.6 million people in skilled, professional, and managerial occupations have emigrated since 1994 and that, for every emigrant, 10 unskilled people lose their jobs. There are a range of causes cited for the migration of skilled South Africans.
In mid-1998, the Southern African Migration Project (SAMP) undertook a study to examine and assess the range of factors that contribute to skilled South Africans’ desire to leave the country: over two-thirds of the sample said that they had given the idea of emigration some thought while 38% said they had given it a "great deal of thought". Among the reasons cited for wishing to leave the country was the declining quality of life and high levels of crime. Furthermore, the government's affirmative action policy was identified as another factor influencing the emigration of skilled white South Africans. The results of the survey indicate that skilled whites are strongly opposed to this policy and the arguments advanced in support of it.
However, flight of human capital in South Africa should not be attributed solely to regional factors. For example, the demand for skilled labourers in the UK, US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia has led to active recruitment programs by those countries in South Africa. These countries accounted for 75% (by volume) of recent skilled emigration with the UK receiving approximately half of annual skilled South African emigration from 1990 to 1996. It has been suggested that the role of domestic socio-political variables may be negligible. The health sector has been hit particularly hard.
A widespread skills drain in South Africa and in the developing world in general is generally considered to be a cause for concern.
For the medical sector, the loss of returns from investment for all doctors emigrating is $1.41bn for South Africa. The benefit to destination countries is huge: $2.7bn for the United Kingdom alone.
In a case of reverse brain drain a net 359,000 high-skilled South Africans have returned to South Africa from foreign work assignments over a five-year period from 2008 to 2013. This was catalysed by the global financial crisis of 2007-8 and perceptions of higher quality of life in South Africa relative to the countries from which they first emigrated to. It is estimated that around 37% of those returning are professionals such as lawyers, doctors, engineers and accountants.
Illegal immigration
See also: Immigration to South Africa and
Xenophobia in South Africa
Refugees from poorer neighbouring countries include many immigrants from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Malawi and others, representing a large portion of the informal sector . With high unemployment levels amongst poorer South Africans, xenophobia is prevalent and many South Africans feel resentful of immigrants who are seen to be depriving the native population of jobs, a feeling which has been given credibility by the fact that many South African employers have employed migrants from other countries for lower pay than South African citizens, especially in the construction, tourism, agriculture and domestic service industries. Illegal immigrants are also heavily involved in informal trading.However, many immigrants to South Africa continue to live in poor conditions, and the South African immigration policy has become increasingly restrictive since 1994.
Trade unions
Main article: Trade unions in South Africa
Since 2007 the South African unions representing public sector workers recurrently went on strike, demanding pay rises significantly above inflation, in a practice that some experts argue is suppressing job growth, harming millions of South Africans who are out of a job.
In August and September 2010, South African unions organised a crippling four-week national strike involving 1.3 million public sector workers, demanding an 8.6% wage increase. The strike ended after the government had raised its 5.2% wage increase to 7.5%. The deal swelled state spending by about 1%.
Protesters sought to block hospitals, and South African media have reported numerous acts of violence against health and education staff who insisted on going to work. Volunteers and army medics were called in to help at hospitals, and some patients were moved to private medical facilities.
There is a persistent wage differential between unionised and non-unionised workers in South Africa, suggesting that unions are keeping wages higher for their members, thereby posing additional challenges to the unemployment problem.
In July 2014 amidst a national strike by 220,000 metalworkers, General Motors temporarily shut down its vehicle assembly plant, frustrating its plans to build 50,000 cars a year in the country. "The ongoing labour disruptions are harming the South African economy and are affecting the country's image around the globe," the company said in a statement at the time.
Black Economic Empowerment
The demise of apartheid in 1994 left a skewed racial economic hierarchy that placed whites firmly at the top, followed by Indians, coloureds, and then blacks. Since then the African National Congress government has made Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) a policy centre-piece, but by the party's own admission it has failed to improve the lot of the vast majority of black South Africans and has taken much opportunity from the white minority, who are mainly a skilled minority. As of 2014 roughly ten percent of the Top 100 companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange were directly held by black investors though Black Economic Empowerment schemes. Black Economic Empowerment policies have been credited with creating a class of black South Africans with a level of wealth on the same order of magnitude as very rich white South Africans. :2
Black Economic Empowerment—its purpose the "economic empowerment of all black people, including women, workers, youth, people with disabilities and people living in rural areas"—requires the Minister of Trade and Industry to develop and publish Codes of Good Practice, aimed at setting guidelines for the process of BEE in the whole economy. A scorecard is used by the Department to measure compliance with the BEE requirements, and is used for public procurement, public-private partnerships, sale of state-owned enterprises, when licenses are applied for, and for any other relevant economic activity.
The government's Black Economic Empowerment policies have drawn criticism from the Development Bank of Southern Africa for focusing "almost exclusively on promoting individual ownership by black people (which) does little to address broader economic disparities, though the rich may become more diverse." The System has also been criticised for placing lesser educated people in more important positions in the workplace and their failure to perform to the standards required has had an immense impact on the economy. Another criticism also includes that the system goes against the constitution's preaching of equality by having preference over people, not on merit, but for their skin colour and is considered the opposite of what many people fought for during the Apartheid era. Official
affirmative action policies have seen a rise in black economic wealth and an emerging black middle class. An increasing number of black candidates who are supposed to be beneficiaries of affirmative action are dissociating themselves from it, largely because of the perception that the appointments are not based on merit.The policy has also been criticized for having a negative impact on employment levels as it is viewed as being more of an additional burden for employees than as a transformative agent for the unemployed.:2 Particularity in an economy where a major cause of inequality has been a growing disparity of income within the majority black population divided along lines of employment. :12
Gender Equality
South Africans, in general, regardless of race, hold what would be considered "traditional" stances on gender roles for men and women. The majority of the workforce is composed of males, while the majority of women do not participate. This viewpoint on males as "breadwinners" is very much in line with traditional African values across the continent. Additionally, females face a problem in terms of earnings, with 77% of women earning the same as their male counterparts.However, more women are becoming part of the agricultural workforce (55%) as of 2012, marking a move towards modernization for women' participation in the economy.
South African legislation is strongly geared to promoting gender equality in the work place. This is characterized by several comprehensive government programs and organizations that provide resources and services to females, both adult and adolescent. Such initiatives include the Employment Equity Act, No. 55 of 1988 (aimed at promoting women's participation in mainly private sector jobs). UNFPA South Africa is one such promoter of these policies and programs. Internally, the South African government has founded the Commission for Gender Equality.The commissions main focus is on securing adequate education and job training for women who are disenfranchised or otherwise at a disadvantage when attempting to enter the workforce.
Not uncommon in Africa, gender equality seems to be a very cogent problem in the South African work force. According to Bain & Company, around 31% of companies have no form of female leadership, either in management or executive positions. 22% of board directors are women, however, only 7% were designated as "executives". Additionally, the number of females in executive positions is significantly lower than the global average of 12%. Additionally, the eNPE (Employee Net Promoter Score) for women is a net negative (- 4) as compared to men (8), according to a survey conducted of 1000 participants.This indicated a low level of actual economic promotion for women, despite public and international initiative towards the contrary.
Infrastructure
Energy
Main article: Energy in South Africa
After years of sub-standard maintenance and the South African government's inability to manage strategic resources, the state-owned power supplier Eskom started experiencing deficiency in capacity in the electrical generating and reticulation infrastructure in 2007. Such lack led to inability to meet the routine demands of industry and consumers, resulting in countrywide rolling blackouts. Initially, the lack of capacity was triggered by a failure at Koeberg nuclear power station , but a general lack of capacity due to increased demand and lack of government planning soon came to light. The supplier and the South African government has been widely criticised for failing to adequately plan for and construct sufficient electrical generating capacity, although ultimately the government has admitted that it was at fault for refusing to approve funding for investment in infrastructure.
The crisis was resolved within a few months, but the margin between national demand and available capacity is still low (particularly in peak hours), and power stations are under strain, such that another phase of rolling blackouts is probable if parts of the supply are halted for whatever reason. The government and Eskom are currently planning new power stations, at cost to the South African consumer. The power utility plans to have 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power in its grid by 2025.
Water
Main article: Water supply and sanitation in South Africa
Some predictions show surface water supply could decrease by 60% by the year 2070 in parts of the Western Cape.
The South African government planned to spend R69 billion on water infrastructure between 2008 and 2015. This involves building new dams and ancillary infrastructure, and repairing existing infrastructure. South Africa has an estimated total water capacity of 38 billion cubic metres, but will need 65 billion by 2025 if the economy is to keep on growing. The massive urban migration has placed further strain on the country's ageing water infrastructure and created a large backlog.
Developments and Maintenance
As part of an international attempt to modernize infrastructure, South Africa has faced increasing pressure to invest government funds into its water and electricity sectors. At current, these sectors are underfunded by approximately US$464 billion (This is according to the G20 GI Hub).
Income levels
Annual per capita personal income by race group relative to white levels
Year White Coloured Asian Black
1917 100 22.0 22.1 9.1
1924 100 20.0 19.4 7.9
1936 100 15.6 23.1 7.6
1946 100 16.3 23.0 8.9
1956 100 16.9 21.9 8.6
1960 100 15.9 17.1 8.1
1970 100 17.3 20.2 6.8
1975 100 19.4 25.4 8.6
1980 100 19.1 25.5 8.5
1987 100 20.9 30.2 8.5
1993 100 19.3 42.0 10.9
1995 100 20.0 48.4 13.5
2000 100 23.0 41.0 15.9
2008 100 22.0 60.0 13.0
Gini coefficient by race in 2004
White Coloured Asian Black Total
Rural 0.37 0.38 – 0.43 0.51
Urban 0.36 0.45 0.43 0.53 0.56
Overall 0.36 0.47 0.43 0.51 0.59
South Africa has extreme differences in incomes and wealth. The good level of economic growth in the post-apartheid period has led to a measurable decline in income poverty, but inequality has increased. The high level of overall income inequality has further accentuated: the country's Gini coefficient increased by four percentage points, from 0.66 to 0.70, between 1993 and 2008, and income has become increasingly concentrated in the top decile. Inequality between urban and rural areas is changing: while rural poverty rates remain substantially higher than those in urban areas, urban poverty rates are rising and rural rates seem to be falling.
While between-race inequality is slowly falling, an increase in intra-race inequality is preventing the aggregate measures from declining. Despite that, between-race inequality remains a central issue: real incomes have been rising for all groups, but many blacks in the country still live in poverty. At any poverty line, blacks are very much poorer than coloureds, who are very much poorer than Indians, who are poorer than whites.In 2002, according to one estimate, 62% of Black Africans, 29% of Coloureds, 11% of Asians, and 4% of Whites lived in poverty.
The mean per-capita income has risen from R10,741 in 1993 to R24,409 in 2008, but these figures hide large differences in household welfare, both within and across population groups: the average Black income increased from R6,018 in 1993 to R9,718 in 2008; for Coloured households, the increase was from R7,498 to R25,269; for Whites, the increase was from R29,372 to R110,195.While mean income rose about 130% from 1993 to 2008, the median income rose just 15% over the same period, from R4,444 to R5,096, indicating that the increases are being driven by a small number of very large incomes, especially for Whites. [125]
In 2000 the average white household was earning six times more than the average black household. [126] In 2004, 29.8% of all households had an income (at constant 2001 prices) of less than R9,600 per annum, while 10.3% of all households enjoyed an annual income (at constant 2001 prices) of more than R153,601 per annum.
One study using calculations based on National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) data suggests that 47% of South Africans live below the poverty line: 56% of blacks live in poverty compared to 2% of whites, using an arbitrary income poverty line of R502 per capita. Although, it should also be noted that black South Africans make up the majority of the population at 79.2% while white South Africans make up only 8.9% of the population according to the Statistics South Africa census released in 2011. The United Nations Development Program 's Human Development Index (HDI) ranked South Africa 110 out of 169 countries in 2010. The report notes, however, that the region's assessment has improved slowly since 1980. The HDI includes a Human Poverty Index (HPI-1), which ranked South Africa 85 out of 135 countries.
The number of South Africans living below the poverty line, identified according to Apartheid-era social categories, was calculated in one study as 56% "black", 27% "coloured", 9% "Indian", and 2% "white".In the past inequality in South Africa was largely defined along race lines, but it has become increasingly defined by inequality within population groups as the gap between rich and poor within each group has increased substantially.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development proposals for addressing income inequality included: encouraging more saving and investment; a liberalisation of product-market regulation; easier access to credit for small businesses; greater co-ordination in wage bargaining; and measures to tackle the high level of youth unemployment. Some proposals have included wage subsidies for people being trained, a minimum wage differentiated by age, and extended periods of probation for young workers.
A 2011 study published by the University of Cape Town about the richest 10% found that nearly 40% are black, where this group had once been almost exclusively white. While only 29% of the absolute wealthiest [ vague] South Africans are black, this jumps to 50% among the "entry-level" rich (defined as earning more than $4,000 per month). Factors that were found to be common among those in the entry-level rich group include being young, entrepreneurial and having some post-secondary education.
According to one estimate, 10.4% of South Africans belonged to the "higher middle class" in 2004, defined as having a per capita income of over R40,000 (in 2000 Rand).
Taxes and transfers
Taxation
Main article: Taxation in South Africa
The top rate of personal income tax rate in South Africa is 45%; the corporate tax rate is 28%. Other taxes include a value-added tax and a capital gains tax , with the overall tax burden amounting to 23.4% of total domestic income.
Social benefits
South Africa has about three times as many recipients of social benefits as it has income tax-payers, an extremely high ratio by international standards. After 1994 resources have been rapidly reallocated to black households: while approximately 40% of aggregate social spending was directed to whites and 43% to blacks in the mid-1980s, by the late 1990s fully 80% of total social spending was assigned to blacks and less than 10% to whites.
The Unemployment Insurance Fund is financed out of premiums, contributions and benefits depend on earnings, and focuses on insuring workers against the risk of income loss.
Social assistance grants
Social assistance grants are non-contributory, income-tested benefits provided by the state to the poor, and are financed out of general tax revenues without any links between contributions and benefits.They are provided in the form of: grants for older persons; disability grants; war veterans grants; care dependency grants; foster child grants; child support grants; grant-in-aid; social relief of distress.
The state old age pension, received by over 80% of the elderly, is a non-contributory pension and pays more than twice median per capita Black income, thus representing an important source of income for a third of all Black households in the country. It pays R820 (as of September 2007) to people who reach pension age without access to private pensions.
The child support grant provides R330 per month (as of August 2015) for every child in the household younger than 15, and benefited 9.1 million children by April 2009.
The war veterans grant is provided to former soldiers who fought in the Second World War or the Korean War, and pays a maximum amount of R1,190 per month (as of April 2011).
Comparison with other emerging markets
According to a December 2010 article by the South African Government Communication and Information System 's now-defunct BuaNews news service, South Africa was said to compare well to other emerging markets on affordability and availability of capital, financial market sophistication, business tax rates and infrastructure, but to fare poorly on the cost and availability of labour, education, and the use of technology and innovation.
Released in early December 2010 and no longer available online, the survey by Brazil's National Confederation of Industry, “Competitividade Brasil 2010: Comparaçao com Paises Selecionados“, (Competition Brazil: A comparison with selected countries), found South Africa to have the second most sophisticated financial market and the second-lowest effective business tax rate (business taxes as a percentage of company profits), out of 14 surveyed countries. The country was also ranked fourth for ease of accessing capital, fourth for cost of capital, sixth for its transport infrastructure (at the time considered better than that of China, India, Mexico, Brazil and Poland, but behind that of Korea and Chile), and seventh for foreign direct investment as a percentage of GDP: in 2008 it was over 3% of the GDP.
Nevertheless, South Africa is falling behind other emerging markets, such as India and China, owing to several factors: the country is relatively small, without the advantage of a huge domestic customer base; it has had for decades an unusually low rate of saving and investment, partly because of low disposable income; an inadequate education system results in an acute shortage of skilled manpower; a strong and volatile currency deters investors and makes its exports less competitive; the infrastructure, though far better than in the rest of Africa, suffers from severe bottlenecks, including scheduled power shortages, and urgently needs upgrading.
In 2011, after a year of observer status, South Africa officially joined the BRICS group of now-five emerging-market nations at the summit held in Sanya , Hainan, China.

Online shopping from the earth's biggest selection of books, magazines, music, DVDs, videos, electronics, computers, software, apparel & accessories, shoes, jewelry, tools & hardware, housewares, furniture, sporting goods, beauty & personal care, broadband & dsl, gourmet food & just about anything e...

Address

151 Losana Trust
Mbombela
1245

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 18:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 18:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 18:00
Thursday 09:00 - 18:00
Friday 09:00 - 18:00
Saturday 08:00 - 13:00

Telephone

+27846004726

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dr.POUL wayne » professional expect. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Dr.POUL wayne » professional expect.:

Share