12/06/2025
A Note on ‘Strike-breakers’
The on-going demonstrations, and job boycott (a strike by another name), by University of Zimbabwe Lecturers has raised an interesting point in relation to the UZ authorities’ plan to recruit temporary replacements, a classic tactic to ‘break’ a strike.
The striking Lecturers denounced this attempt to render the strike ineffectual by employing temporaries, (sometimes pejoratively referred to as ‘scabs’ or ‘bootlickers’).
Our interest here is in the strikers’ reliance on sub-section (5) of section 108 (‘Protection of persons engaged in Lawful Collective Job Action’) of the Labour Act to seek to invalidate the employer’s strike-breaking tactic.
It seems to me that section 108(5) is actually irrelevant, in that it relates to a Lock-out by the Employer (to put pressure on employees during negotiations), rather than to a Strike by Employees.
Section 108(5) stipulates –
“An Employer may not employ any person for the purpose of performing the work of an Employee
who is Locked out”
In this instance, the Employer did not lock-out the Employees; they ‘walked off the job’.
Footnote
While all occupations and professions are important, it surely says something not complimentary about the state of the nation that, as our final items in this Bulletin reveal, last year the lowest grade employees in the three industries we report earned more than junior lecturers at the University of Zimbabwe – in some cases, considerably more.
Send a message to learn more