Premier Computing

Premier Computing Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Premier Computing, Business consultant, 11456 S. Temple Drive, South Jordan, UT.

In business since 1952, Premier Computing, Inc., a Gold Enterprise Resource Planning reseller, delivers business management (ERP) Transformation Resource Planning (TRP) and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solutions and services to growing mid-market businesses throughout the United States. Our primary product offerings are Acumatica, AdoBots, and support for Microsoft Dynamics GP

In additi

on we offer support, training, reporting, business intelligence, customization and integration services in order to deliver end to end business solutions for organizations in the following industries:

- Distribution
- Manufacturing
- Construction
- Financials
- Field Services
- Bot Automation

50–75% of ERP migrations fail to deliver their promised outcomes. GP migrations aren't an exception.The timeline slips. ...
09/03/2026

50–75% of ERP migrations fail to deliver their promised outcomes. GP migrations aren't an exception.
The timeline slips. The budget expands. The team resists. The partner disappears.
And two years later you have a system that technically works but nobody fully trusts while the consultant who sold it has already moved on to their next project.
At Premier Tech Partners, we've spent years implementing and extricating GP migrations across Acumatica, Business Central, and other platforms.
We observe exactly where they go wrong. And we've built a methodology Catalyst360 specifically designed to prevent it.
Before any client commits to scope, platform, or budget, we run a focused assessment that answers the questions every GP migration depends on:
✅ What does your current GP footprint actually look like customizations, integrations, dependencies?
✅ What are the 3–5 things that absolutely cannot break during migration?
✅ Which platform genuinely fits your business model not which one was demoed best?
✅ What does a phased migration look like that keeps your operations running?
This is what our Catalyst360 GP Migration Roadmap Call delivers.
One session. No pitch. A clear, honest picture of your migration path before you commit to anything.
If you're a CFO, COO, or Controller on GP who knows the clock is ticking this is the conversation worth having first.
📩 DM me "ROADMAP" or visit the link in my profile to book your session.
👉 Or read our full guide on getting GP migration right: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07CQ--0

GP migration isn't a platform decision. It's a business transformation decision. Here's how to think about it correctly....
09/02/2026

GP migration isn't a platform decision. It's a business transformation decision. Here's how to think about it correctly.
Most migration conversations start in the wrong place.
They start with: "Which ERP should we move to?"
They should start with: "Why are we really migrating and what can't break?"
Here's the framework we use before we ever discuss platforms:
Reality first map what's actually true. Before scoping a single requirement, we document: → How GP is actually being used (not how it was designed) → Every customization, integration, and workaround in the current system → Which processes are genuine business advantages vs "how we've always done it" → Where GP is the real constraint vs where process redesign would help
Then risk — identify the landmines.
The most expensive GP migration mistakes are entirely predictable:
→ Assuming customizations will transfer (plan to clean or rebuild 60–80%)
→ Big bang go-live when phased migration would eliminate most of the risk
→ Treating it as an IT project when finance and ops need to lead it
→ Not planning for the 20–30% productivity dip in the first quarter post-go-live
Then roadmap — design the migration around your business, not a module list.
Foundation first: Chart of accounts, master data, core workflows. Prove it works: Start with non-critical modules, validate before migrating revenue-critical processes. Expand deliberately: Core financials next, then advanced features and automation.
This order matters because it gives your team time to build trust and train in the new system before the business depends on it.
The companies that follow this sequence don't just survive migration. They come out with better processes, better visibility, and a system they actually want to use.
👉 Get the full Reality, Risk, Roadmap breakdown: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07Bw550

A $40M manufacturer was 18 months into their GP migration. Nobody could tell them whether to keep going or cut their los...
09/01/2026

A $40M manufacturer was 18 months into their GP migration. Nobody could tell them whether to keep going or cut their losses.
They'd done everything right on paper.
Microsoft Gold Partner. ✓ 6-month timeline. ✓ Executive sponsor. ✓ Project management structure. ✓
18 months later:
→ Core operations still running on GP
→ Business Central technically "live" but not trusted by anyone
→ Custom reports: didn't exist
→ Warehouse integration: broken
→ Finance team: reconciling two systems every month-end close
When they called us, they weren't asking us to fix Business Central.
They were asking: "Should we scrap this entirely and start over?"
Here's what the assessment revealed:
The platform wasn't the problem. The requirements were never properly scoped. The workflows were designed in conference rooms, not based on actual operations. The integration was built to achieve go-live not to actually function.
None of that is Business Central's fault. None of it is the finance team's fault either.
It's what happens when a migration project starts with platform selection instead of reality workflow mapping.
We didn't scrap Business Central. We stabilized it. Within 6 months, the first full month closed entirely in the new system. Within 12 months, they had better reporting visibility than GP ever offered.
The COO told us: "You gave us a process we can trust and a partner who doesn't disappear when things get hard."
What's the hardest part of your GP migration conversation right now? I'd genuinely like to hear it. 👇
👉 Read our full guide on getting GP migration right: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07ySMZ0

Your GP migration is either going to make your business better or set it back two years. There's rarely a middle ground....
09/01/2026

Your GP migration is either going to make your business better or set it back two years. There's rarely a middle ground. The companies that get it right share one thing in common: They got clarity before they committed. They didn't start with vendor demos. They didn't start with platform comparisons. They started with an honest picture of their current state and a phased roadmap built around their actual business, not a textbook process. That's the conversation we have in every Catalyst360 GP Migration Roadmap Call. We help CFOs, COOs, and Controllers: → Understand exactly what their GP migration will require in time, money, and internal capacity → Avoid the 6 mistakes we see companies make over and over again → Choose the right platform for their business model not the one that demos best → Design a migration that keeps operations running throughout the process Whether you're evaluating Acumatica, Business Central, NetSuite, or not sure yet, this call will give you the clarity to make that decision confidently. No hard sell. No pressure. Just an honest roadmap. Because the most important decision in your company's next three years shouldn't be made based on fear, vendor hype, or fingers crossed. Comment ROADMAP below and we'll send you the link to book your session directly. 👉 Or read our full guide on getting GP migration right: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07yDDL0

Migrating from GP to a new ERP? Don't start with platform selection. Start with this.Most companies open their GP migrat...
08/28/2026

Migrating from GP to a new ERP? Don't start with platform selection. Start with this.
Most companies open their GP migration conversation with: "Should we go to Business Central or Acumatica?"
That's the wrong first question.
Before you evaluate a single platform, you need to know the answers to these three things:
1. Your Current State Reality: How is GP actually being used not how it was designed to be used? Every customization. Every workaround. Every integration. Which processes are genuine business advantages vs habits you've never questioned? Where is GP the constraint and where would process redesign help more than new software?
Until you map this, you can't scope a migration. You can't assess platform fit. And you definitely can't set a realistic timeline or budget.
2. Your Data Reality: What has to migrate vs what can archive? What does your data actually look like and what cleanup does it need before it moves? What reporting and analytics are you dependent on that don't exist natively in most new platforms?
This step alone reveals more budget risk than any other part of the project.
3. Your Team Reality: Who holds the institutional knowledge of how GP works? What's the real adoption challenge, not the optimistic one in the project plan? Where is change management going to be hardest and have you actually budgeted for it?
Once you have honest answers to all three, platform selection becomes straightforward.
Without them, you're choosing software before you understand the problem you're solving.
That's how migrations take 18 months instead of 6.
👉 More on how to start your GP migration the right way: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07wvsP0

"You didn't just fix our ERP. You gave us a process we can trust and a partner who doesn't disappear when things get har...
08/27/2026

"You didn't just fix our ERP. You gave us a process we can trust and a partner who doesn't disappear when things get hard."
That's what the COO of a $40M manufacturing and distribution company said to us after we spent six months cleaning up what their previous partner had left behind.
Here's what that company looked like when they found us:
They'd been on Business Central for over a year. Technically "live." But their finance team was still reconciling books in two systems every single month. Their warehouse integration was broken. Their custom reporting didn't exist. And every person who knew how things worked in GP was using tribal knowledge to keep the business running.
The previous partner had done their job, at least on paper. The project was closed. The invoice was paid. They moved on.
What nobody had done was ask the right questions before the project started:
What processes genuinely can't break? What does your team need to actually adopt this system? What does success look like at 12 months, not just at go-live?
We didn't scrap Business Central. We stabilized it. Rebuilt the integrations properly. Redesigned the workflows causing resistance. Trained the team on processes not just software clicks.
Within 6 months the finance team closed their first full month without touching GP.
Not because the software changed. Because the approach changed.
Has your company been through a migration that went sideways? I'd love to hear what happened and what turned it around. 👇
👉 Read more on getting GP migration right: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07tLGf0

GP is on borrowed time. The question isn't whether you migrate. It's whether you do it right.Microsoft's message has bee...
08/26/2026

GP is on borrowed time. The question isn't whether you migrate. It's whether you do it right.
Microsoft's message has been clear for years now: No new features. No major updates. A support timeline with an expiration date.
If you're still on Dynamics GP, you're already in the window where your migration decision matters more than your platform choice.
Here's what we know after working with dozens of companies through this:
The platform is only 30% of success.
The other 70% is:
→ Proper scoping and requirements definition before anyone talks platforms
→ A phased migration strategy that doesn't put everything at risk at once
→ Change management so your team actually adopts what you build
→ A partner who stays with you beyond go-live
That's exactly what our Catalyst360 GP Migration Roadmap Call is designed to give you.
One focused session. No pitch. No vendor agenda.
In that call we'll help you:
✅ Map your current GP reality every customization, integration, and workaround
✅ Identify the 3–5 things that absolutely cannot break during migration
✅ Explore platform options based on your actual business model not whoever demos best
✅ Design a phased migration strategy that keeps operations running throughout
If Premier + Catalyst360 is the right fit, we'll tell you exactly how. If a different approach makes more sense for your business we'll tell you that too.
📩 Comment ROADMAP below and we'll send you the link to book your session.
👉 Or read our full guide on getting GP migration right: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07qncW0

The 6 GP migration mistakes that cost companies millions and how to avoid every one of them.We've worked with dozens of ...
08/25/2026

The 6 GP migration mistakes that cost companies millions and how to avoid every one of them.
We've worked with dozens of companies migrating from Microsoft Dynamics GP.
The ones that got it right avoided these mistakes. The ones that got it wrong, learned to adapt the expensive way.
Mistake 1: Choosing a platform based on who migrates your data. Data migration is the easy part. The hard part is adoption, process fit, and whether your essential workflows survive. Choose the platform that fits your business and goals for growth. Then find a partner who can implement and train your workforce properly.
Mistake 2: Thinking "Cloud GP" solves your problems. It doesn't. Moving GP to the cloud solves one problem: access. It doesn't address GP's functional limitations, aging user experience, or Microsoft's long-term roadmap away from the platform. Cloud hosting may buy you 12–24 months, but it doesn't address the underlying issues.
Mistake 3: Treating migration as an IT project. ERP migration is a business transformation that happens to involve software. Finance and operations need to lead with IT support. If your IT team is running this alone, that's the first risk.
Mistake 4: Big bang go-live. We have never seen a big bang GP migration that didn't create chaos. Your team learns everything at once, critical functions break, you can't roll back. Month-end close becomes a nightmare for months, instead of the promised days. Phase it. Always.
Mistake 5: Underestimating customization impact. Most GP implementations have more customization than anyone realizes. Custom reports. Modified workflows. Integration scripts. Add-ons that don't exist on your new platform. Catalog everything early. Budget to rebuild 60–80% of it, or prepare to adapt to the out-of-box capabilities on the new platform.
Mistake 6: Not planning for the post-migration dip. Expect 20–30% lower productivity for the first quarter after go-live. Your team is adjusting to new processes while under deadline pressure. The companies that plan for this survive it. The ones that assume Day 1 efficiency, don't.
Save this. Share it with whoever is leading your GP migration conversation.
👉 More on getting GP migration right: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07qmgy0

We got a call from a CFO who was 18 months into a GP migration.The CFO wasn't panicking, they were exhausted.They'd hir...
08/25/2026

We got a call from a CFO who was 18 months into a GP migration.
The CFO wasn't panicking, they were exhausted.
They'd hired a Microsoft Gold Partner. Had a 6-month timeline. Had executive buy-in and a project plan.
18 months later: → Still running GP for core operations → Business Central was "live" but nobody trusted it → Custom reports didn't exist → Integration with their warehouse was broken → Finance team working weekends to close books in two systems
She called us not to fix Business Central.
She called to ask whether they should scrap it entirely and start over.
Here's what we found when we dug in:
The platform wasn't the problem. The company requirements were never properly scoped. The workflows were designed in conference rooms not on the actual floor. The integration architecture was built to get them live, not to improve workflow.
Nobody clarified that before the contract was signed.
That's not a migration story. That's a disaster with a project plan attached to it.
If you're on GP and you know the clock is ticking drop a comment below. Tell me where you are in your thinking. I promise it's a safer conversation than the one you'll have 18 months from now if you start without a real roadmap. 👇

👉 Read our full guide on avoiding the traps that cause stories like this: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07qmQC0

Overall satisfaction scores tell you part of the story. This is the part most comparisons skip. The G2 Fall 2025 report ...
08/21/2026

Overall satisfaction scores tell you part of the story. This is the part most comparisons skip. The G2 Fall 2025 report (5,558 verified reviews) shows Acumatica ahead of NetSuite across the board but the gap widens sharply once you look at the workflows manufacturing, distribution, and construction teams actually run every day: ✅ MRP: 82% vs 64% ✅ Shop Floor: 81% vs 63% ✅ Field Service Dispatch: 79% vs 61% ✅ WIP: 83% vs 66% ✅ Inventory Forecasting: 82% vs 67% These aren't small preference differences. These are the systems that decide whether your team spends the day working, or working around the software. The real question isn't "which ERP is bigger." It's "which one fits the complexity you actually manage every week." Which of these areas is causing the most friction for your team right now? Drop a comment.
full breakdown is here: https://na2.hubs.ly/H07mVG10

Address

11456 S. Temple Drive
South Jordan, UT
84095

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Telephone

+18778184580

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Premier Computing posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Premier Computing:

Shortcuts

Share

Category